BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9419667)

  • 21. Matching breast masses depicted on different views a comparison of three methods.
    Zheng B; Tan J; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1338-47. PubMed ID: 19632867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A genetic algorithm-based method for optimizing the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
    Anastasio MA; Yoshida H; Nagel R; Nishikawa RM; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1613-20. PubMed ID: 9775365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of masses on digitized mammograms.
    Radovic M; Milosevic M; Ninkovic S; Filipovic N; Peulic A
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(6):757-74. PubMed ID: 26409521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combined adaptive enhancement and region-growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms.
    Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1642-54. PubMed ID: 10501064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.
    Wei J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2827-38. PubMed ID: 16266097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms.
    Danala G; Patel B; Aghaei F; Heidari M; Li J; Wu T; Zheng B
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1419-1431. PubMed ID: 29748869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms.
    Tourassi GD; Harrawood B; Singh S; Lo JY; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 17278499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms.
    Li L; Qian W; Clarke LP
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Nov; 4(11):724-31. PubMed ID: 9365751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
    Patel BK; Ranjbar S; Wu T; Pockaj BA; Li J; Zhang N; Lobbes M; Zhang B; Mitchell JR
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():207-213. PubMed ID: 29279165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for the segmentation of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.
    Gavrielides MA; Lo JY; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 11998828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
    Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses using visually sensitive image features.
    Wang Y; Aghaei F; Zarafshani A; Qiu Y; Qian W; Zheng B
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(1):171-186. PubMed ID: 27911353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
    van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An improved method of region grouping for microcalcification detection in digital mammograms.
    Qian W; Mao F; Sun X; Zhang Y; Song D; Clarke RA
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002; 26(6):361-8. PubMed ID: 12453502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ipsilateral-mammogram computer-aided detection of breast cancer.
    Sun X; Qian W; Song D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Apr; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 15081498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
    Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.