These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 941970)

  • 1. The visual evoked response to word stimuli in the visual fields.
    Berman MS
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1976 Jun; 53(6):287-93. PubMed ID: 941970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interhemispheric asymmetries in the visual evoked response: effects of stimulus lateralisation and task.
    Rugg MD; Beaumont JG
    Biol Psychol; 1978 Jun; 6(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 708813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Hemispheric asymetry of the evoked electrical activity of the cerebral cortex to letter and non-verbal stimuli].
    Kostandov EA; Genkina OA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1976; 26(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 1274440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of visual field size on hemispheric asymmetry of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.
    Mecacci L; Spinelli D; Viggiano MP
    Int J Neurosci; 1990 Mar; 51(1-2):141-51. PubMed ID: 2265903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ongoing occipital rhythms and the VER. I. Stimulation at peaks of the alpha-rhythm.
    Trimble JL; Potts AM
    Invest Ophthalmol; 1975 Jul; 14(7):537-46. PubMed ID: 166959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual evoked response (VER) changes during maturation in the Weddell seal.
    Gruenau SP; Shurley JT
    Dev Psychobiol; 1976 Sep; 9(5):477-93. PubMed ID: 964468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lateralization of repetition effects in event-related potentials to words in left- and right-handed women.
    Nowicka A; Marchewka A; Szatkowska I
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 393(2-3):150-4. PubMed ID: 16229946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
    Hines D
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. III. Effect of stimulus size and localization.
    Katsumi O; Tanino T; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Dec; 64(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 3811882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left dominance for language perception starts in the extrastriate cortex: An ERP and sLORETA study.
    Selpien H; Siebert C; Genc E; Beste C; Faustmann PM; Güntürkün O; Ocklenburg S
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 291():325-333. PubMed ID: 26048428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
    Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
    Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area.
    Cohen L; Lehéricy S; Chochon F; Lemer C; Rivaud S; Dehaene S
    Brain; 2002 May; 125(Pt 5):1054-69. PubMed ID: 11960895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial frequency-dependent asymmetry of visual evoked potential amplitudes.
    van Orden KF; House JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):1011-8. PubMed ID: 8774045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of visual-field and matching instruction on event-related potentials and reaction time.
    Kok A; van De Vijver R; Bouma A
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Oct; 4(4):377-87. PubMed ID: 4084399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Symmetrical hemispheric priming in spatial neglect: a hyperactive left-hemisphere phenomenon?
    Nakamura K; Oga T; Takahashi M; Kuribayashi T; Kanamori Y; Matsumiya T; Maeno Y; Yamamoto M
    Cortex; 2012 Apr; 48(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 21292251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amplitude variability of the steady-state visual evoked response (VER).
    Yolton RL; Allen RG; Goodson RA; Schafer DL; Decker WD
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Aug; 60(8):694-704. PubMed ID: 6624869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Jul; 69(3):293-305. PubMed ID: 3168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of altered central and peripheral visual field stimulation on correct recognition and visual evoked response.
    Mancuso RP; Lawrence AF; Hintze RW; White CT
    Int J Neurosci; 1979; 9(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 478749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric differences for visual evoked potentials from checkerboard stimuli.
    Pike J; Polich J
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(6):947-52. PubMed ID: 3194058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.