These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 941970)

  • 21. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients.
    Cohen L; Dehaene S; Naccache L; Lehéricy S; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Hénaff MA; Michel F
    Brain; 2000 Feb; 123 ( Pt 2)():291-307. PubMed ID: 10648437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials.
    Harter MR; Aine C; Schroeder C
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(4):421-38. PubMed ID: 7133380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early and late VEPs for reading stimuli are altered by common binocular misalignments.
    Suter PS; Bass BL; Suter S
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Sep; 30(5):475-85. PubMed ID: 8416074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection of cerebral lateralization of function using EEG alpha-contingent visual stimulation.
    Goodman DM; Beatty J; Mulholland TB
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Apr; 48(4):418-31. PubMed ID: 6153603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reaction times and evoked potentials as indicators of hemispheric differences for laterally presented name and physical matches.
    Ledlow A; Swanson JM; Kinsbourne M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Aug; 4(3):440-54. PubMed ID: 681891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural correlates of the left-visual-field superiority in face perception appear at multiple stages of face processing.
    Yovel G; Levy J; Grabowecky M; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):462-74. PubMed ID: 12729496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Amplitudes of visually evoked cortical responses due to full-field stimulation and to stimulation with four half-fields.
    Orban D; Müller W
    Ophthalmologica; 1991; 202(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 2057192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words.
    Ortigue S; Michel CM; Murray MM; Mohr C; Carbonnel S; Landis T
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1242-51. PubMed ID: 15050552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Event related potentials (ERP) and behavioral measurements to verbal stimulation of visual fields.
    Itzchak EB; Babkoff H; Faust M
    Cortex; 2007 May; 43(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 17623997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Magnetic stimulation of the left visual cortex impairs expert word recognition.
    Skarratt PA; Lavidor M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1749-58. PubMed ID: 17014378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.
    Ellis AW; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19720073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monocular and binocular neuronal activity in human visual cortex revealed by electrical brain activity mapping.
    Skrandies W
    Exp Brain Res; 1993; 93(3):516-20. PubMed ID: 8519340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual evoked response correlates of cerebral specialization after human commissurotomy.
    Gott PS; Rossiter VS; Galbraith GC; Saul RE
    Biol Psychol; 1977 Sep; 5(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 922081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The size of the neuronal receptive fields of the cat prestriate cortex in the left and right hemispheres].
    Gabibov IM
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1992 Feb; 78(2):23-31. PubMed ID: 1330729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Right hemisphere superiority in the perception of different kinds of non-verbal material.
    Sobótka S; Grabowska AM
    Physiol Bohemoslov; 1985; 34 Suppl():149-52. PubMed ID: 2941785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification of the hemisphere activated by hemifield visual stimulation using a single equivalent dipole model.
    Brigell M; Rubboli G; Celesia GG
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Nov; 87(5):291-9. PubMed ID: 7693440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Role of inter-hemispheric transfer in generating visual evoked potentials in V1-damaged brain hemispheres.
    Kavcic V; Triplett RL; Das A; Martin T; Huxlin KR
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():82-93. PubMed ID: 25575450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects.
    Sugishita M; Hamilton CR; Sakuma I; Hemmi I
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Apr; 32(4):399-415. PubMed ID: 8047248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis.
    Mallecourt J; Chain F; Leblanc M; Lhermitte F
    Biomedicine; 1980 Dec; 32(4):210-6. PubMed ID: 7470584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.