91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9419703)
1. Regression analysis of correlated receiver operating characteristic data.
Toledano A; Gatsonis CA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S30-6; discussion S61-4, S70-1 pass. PubMed ID: 9419703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Random-effects models in the receiver operating characteristic curve-based assessment of the effectiveness of diagnostic imaging technology: concepts, approaches, and issues.
Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S4-13; discussion S57-60, S68-9 pas. PubMed ID: 9419700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S22-9; discussion S57-64, S70-1 pas. PubMed ID: 9419702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Random-effects models for diagnostic accuracy data.
Gatsonis CA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S14-21; discussion S57-67, S61-4 pa. PubMed ID: 9419701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hanley JA
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Metz CE
Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):723-31. PubMed ID: 1399456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Model checking for ROC regression analysis.
Cai T; Zheng Y
Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 17447940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
Pepe MS
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Assessment of diagnostic result for medical image by receiver operating characteristic and forced choice].
Yue X; Ye Y; Deng Z; Jiang D; Zheng C
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1998 Sep; 15(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12553254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size estimation: a glimpse beyond simple formulas.
Eng J
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):606-12. PubMed ID: 14990827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):709-16. PubMed ID: 9419629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of the new methodology of analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves.
Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Yamauchi K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():837-40. PubMed ID: 10384578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations.
Wagner RF; Beiden SV; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2001 Apr; 8(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 11293781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
Metz CE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistics review 13: receiver operating characteristic curves.
Bewick V; Cheek L; Ball J
Crit Care; 2004 Dec; 8(6):508-12. PubMed ID: 15566624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of regression trees, logistic regression, generalized additive models, and multivariate adaptive regression splines for predicting AMI mortality.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(15):2937-57. PubMed ID: 17186501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [BVC (bias to variance characteristic) analysis].
Matsumoto T
Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Dec; 34(13):1539-47. PubMed ID: 2622045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Hillis SL; Obuchowski NA; Schartz KM; Berbaum KS
Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1579-607. PubMed ID: 15685718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
