These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9419829)

  • 41. Predicting Endurance Time in a Repetitive Lift and Carry Task Using Linear Mixed Models.
    Beck B; Ham DJ; Best SA; Carstairs GL; Savage RJ; Straney L; Caldwell JN
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158418. PubMed ID: 27379902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of frequency and load to lift on endurance time.
    Genaidy AM; Asfour SS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jan; 32(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 2924761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Active vs. passive attentional manipulation and multidimensional perceptions of exercise intensity.
    Johnson J; Siegel D
    Can J Sport Sci; 1987 Mar; 12(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 3594318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Validity of the baltimore therapeutic equipment work simulator in the measurement of lifting endurance in healthy men.
    Ting W; Wessel J; Brintnell S; Maikala R; Bhambhani Y
    Am J Occup Ther; 2001; 55(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 11761134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Role of obesity on cerebral hemodynamics and cardiorespiratory responses in healthy men during repetitive incremental lifting.
    Cavuoto LA; Maikala RV
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 Sep; 115(9):1905-17. PubMed ID: 25896283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Physical fatigue in high and very high frequency manual materials handling: perceived exertion and physiological indicators.
    Mital A; Foononi-Fard H; Brown ML
    Hum Factors; 1994 Jun; 36(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 8070788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Impact of ceiling restriction and lifting barriers on selected physiological and perceptual responses.
    Christie CJ; Wolfe A
    Work; 2011; 38(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 21447883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of isokinetic and isoinertial lifting tests as predictors of maximal lifting capacity.
    Jacobs I; Bell DG; Pope J
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1988; 57(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 3349979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Precision markedly attenuates repetitive lift capacity.
    Collier BR; Holland L; McGhee D; Sampson JA; Bell A; Stapley PJ; Groeller H
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(9):1427-39. PubMed ID: 25012299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Manual lifting of patients in a hospital. Risk analysis for an improvement project].
    Speziale M; Ciampolini M
    Med Lav; 2009; 100(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 19960778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Lifting capacity. Indices of subject effort.
    Hazard RG; Reeves V; Fenwick JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 Sep; 17(9):1065-70. PubMed ID: 1411758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effects of container design and stair climbing on maximal acceptable lift weight, wrist posture, psychophysical, and physiological responses in wafer-handling tasks.
    Chung HC; Wang MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2001 Dec; 32(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 11703045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An experimental evaluation of psychophysical criteria for repetitive lifting work.
    Gamberale F; Ljungberg AS; Annwall G; Kilbom A
    Appl Ergon; 1987 Dec; 18(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 15676636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Boundary line between the strength and endurance regions in manual lifting.
    Mital A; Wang LW; Fard HF
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1987 Nov; 2(4):220-2. PubMed ID: 23915758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reliability of repetitive dynamic strengths as a screening tool for manual lifting tasks.
    Mital A; Channaveeraiah C; Fard HF; Khaledi H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1986 Aug; 1(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 23915503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Test-retest variation in lifting capacity and indices of subject effort.
    Hazard R; Reeves V; Fenwick J; Fleming B; Pope M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1993 Jan; 8(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 23915825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Maximal and sub-maximal functional lifting performance at different platform heights.
    Savage RJ; Jaffrey MA; Billing DC; Ham DJ
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(5):762-9. PubMed ID: 25420678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dynamic analysis of isoinertial lifting technique.
    Stevenson JM; Bryant JT; French SL; Greenhorn DR; Andrew GM; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 28080938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Perceived submaximal force production in young adult males and females.
    Jackson AW; Dishman RK
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Feb; 32(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 10694130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison between the CR10 Borg's scale and the VAS (visual analogue scale) during an arm-cranking exercise.
    Capodaglio EM
    J Occup Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 11(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11706532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.