These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9420996)

  • 1. Research in critically ill patients.
    Lackner FX
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl; 1997; 111():160-2. PubMed ID: 9420996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing regulations for research involving adults who lack decision-making capacity.
    Fleischman AR
    Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1999; 110():131-43; discussion 143-5. PubMed ID: 10344013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB.
    Mitchell SC; Steingrub J
    IRB; 1988; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Waived consent for emergency research.
    Fost N
    Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):163-83. PubMed ID: 9702271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ethics of phase I pediatric oncology trials.
    Ackerman TF
    IRB; 1995; 17(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11653060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rate of refusal to participate in clinical trials.
    Shimm DS; Spece RG
    IRB; 1992; 14(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
    Stell LK
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Futility: the concept and its use -- an educational resource for ethics advisory committees.
    Nelson W; Durnan JR; Spritz N; Corsino B; Kantor J; Spaulding M; Bleck T; Martin L
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(3):19-26. PubMed ID: 11652971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Death wish: resuscitating self-determination for the critically ill.
    Boozang KM
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):23-85. PubMed ID: 12645555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
    Macklin R
    IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical considerations of new guidelines for emergency research.
    McCarthy CR
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1996 Feb; 153(2):507-8. PubMed ID: 8564088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.
    White DB; Curtis JR; Lo B; Luce JM
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2053-9. PubMed ID: 16763515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimal risk, administrative firm trials, and informed consent.
    O'Neil TJ; Goldberg H; McGough H
    IRB; 1992; 14(3):9-10, 12. PubMed ID: 11656139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The entitlement of Veterans Affairs medical patients to vulnerable population status for human medical research.
    McGuire ER
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):259-301. PubMed ID: 10124880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health science research ethics: a critique.
    Coburn D
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10125790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The expert surrogate system: a role for the Golden Rule in clinical practice.
    Mackillop WJ
    Humane Med; 1988 Nov; 4(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 11650833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The case of Chester M. Southam: research ethics and the limits of professional responsibility.
    Preminger BA
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2002; 65(2):4-9. PubMed ID: 12099116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical care research and informed consent.
    Saver RS
    North Carol Law Rev; 1996 Nov; 75(1):205-71. PubMed ID: 11768416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification of critically ill patients: a legal examination.
    Fama AJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1980 Oct; 24(3):514-33. PubMed ID: 11665253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
    Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
    IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.