209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9421245)
1. A comparison of longitudinal measurements in the spine and proximal femur using lunar and hologic instruments.
Pocock NA; Noakes KA; Griffiths M; Bhalerao N; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA; Freund J
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Dec; 12(12):2113-8. PubMed ID: 9421245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of rates of bone loss from the spine measured using two manufacturers' densitometers.
Peel NF; Eastell R
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Nov; 10(11):1796-801. PubMed ID: 8592958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Choi D; Kim DY; Han CS; Kim S; Bok HS; Huh W; Ko JW; Hong SH
Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19924413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-calibration of Lunar DPX-IQ and DPX dual-energy x-ray densitometers for bone mineral measurements in women: effect of body anthropometry.
Saarelainen J; Honkanen R; Vanninen E; Kröger H; Tuppurainen M; Niskanen L; Jurvelin JS
J Clin Densitom; 2005; 8(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 16055963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of bone mineral density of lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck and Ward's triangle by forearm bone mineral density.
Trivitayaratana W; Trivitayaratana P; Kongkiatikul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Mar; 84(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 11460941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of lunar and hologic instruments.
Pocock NA; Sambrook PN; Nguyen T; Kelly P; Freund J; Eisman JA
J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Sep; 7(9):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1414500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population bone mineral density measurements for Chinese women and men in Hong Kong.
Woo J; Li M; Lau E
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 11420778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gender disparity in BMD conversion: a comparison between Lunar and Hologic densitometers.
Ganda K; Nguyen TV; Pocock N
Arch Osteoporos; 2014; 9():180. PubMed ID: 25527404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Densitometer-Specific Differences in the Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score.
Mazzetti G; Berger C; Leslie WD; Hans D; Langsetmo L; Hanley DA; Kovacs CS; Prior JC; Kaiser SM; Davison KS; Josse R; Papaioannou A; Adachi JR; Goltzman D; Morin SN;
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 28034592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of a new positioner on the precision of hip bone mineral density measurements.
Hans D; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Horn S; Avioli LV; Drezner MK; Meunier PJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Aug; 12(8):1289-94. PubMed ID: 9258760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardization of spine and hip BMD measurements in different DXA devices.
Ozdemir A; Uçar M
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 17289322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo precision of the GE Lunar iDXA densitometer for the measurement of total-body, lumbar spine, and femoral bone mineral density in adults.
Hind K; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 20705494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of spine and femur reference data in native Chinese women from different regions of China.
Wu XP; Liao EY; Dai RC; Shan PF; Fang TY; Luo XH; Pi YZ; Jiang Y
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Oct; 16(10):1215-24. PubMed ID: 15782285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissimilar spine and femoral Z-scores in premenopausal women.
Bonnick SL; Nichols DL; Sanborn CF; Lloyd K; Payne SG; Lewis L; Reed CA
Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Oct; 61(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 9312194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Appropriateness and limitations of bone mineral measurements by DXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) in the elderly--comparison with x-ray findings].
Suzuki T; Nagai H; Yoshida H; Kusumoto A; Ayano H; Kumagai S; Watanabe S; Shibata H; Yasumura S; Haga H
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1995 Jun; 42(6):385-97. PubMed ID: 7647356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
