208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9421245)
21. A preliminary evaluation of the lunar expert-XL for bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry.
Lang T; Takada M; Gee R; Wu C; Li J; Hayashi-Clark C; Schoen S; March V; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 9240736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems.
Svendsen OL; Marslew U; Hassager C; Christiansen C
Eur J Nucl Med; 1992; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 1547807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Discordance of longitudinal changes in bone density between densitometers.
Frost SA; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 17870039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dual-photon bone mineral density in the proximal femur: correlation by site.
Wahl RL; Waldmann S; Shapiro B
Nucl Med Commun; 1988 Jan; 9(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3386972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and bone area: United States, 2005-2008.
Looker AC; Borrud LG; Hughes JP; Fan B; Shepherd JA; Melton LJ
Vital Health Stat 11; 2012 Mar; (251):1-132. PubMed ID: 24261130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A cross-calibration study of the GE-Lunar iDXA and prodigy for the assessment of lumbar spine and total hip bone parameters via three statistical methods.
Hind K; Cooper W; Oldroyd B; Davies A; Rhodes L
J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 24120577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of two methods for measuring ultrasound properties of the heel in postmenopausal women.
Ingle BM; Sherwood KE; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):500-5. PubMed ID: 11446567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur.
Tothill P; Fenner JA; Reid DM
Br J Radiol; 1995 Jun; 68(810):621-9. PubMed ID: 7627485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. BMD measurement and precision: a comparison of GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA densitometers.
Krueger D; Vallarta-Ast N; Checovich M; Gemar D; Binkley N
J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 22071029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The contribution of cortical and cancellous bone to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the female proximal femur.
Lundeen GA; Knecht SL; Vajda EG; Bloebaum RD; Hofmann AA
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 11315237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers.
Laskey MA; Flaxman ME; Barber RW; Trafford S; Hayball MP; Lyttle KD; Crisp AJ; Compston JE
Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1023-9. PubMed ID: 1742583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differential effects of hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density and axial transmission ultrasound measurements in cortical bone.
Knapp KM; Blake GM; Spector TD; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 12730793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Total body, spine, and femur dual X-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.
Nuti R; Martini G; Gennari C
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Dec; 53(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 8293352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Bone density of the lumbar spine and femur in acromegaly].
Hübsch P; Kotzmann H; Svoboda T; Kainberger FM; Bankier A; Seidl G
Radiologe; 1993 Aug; 33(8):457-61. PubMed ID: 8372172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur of normal females in Buenos Aires].
Mautalen C; Rubin Z; Vega E; Ghiringhelli G; Fromm G
Medicina (B Aires); 1990; 50(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2292907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
