These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9421559)
1. Mammography screening under 50: a limited perspective on a multifaceted issue. Royak-Schaler R; Gallant SJ; Klabunde CN Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):243-9; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9421559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs. Greif JM Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 20371181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment, screening and prevention of breast cancer: A look at cost-effectiveness. Lebovic GS; Hollingsworth A; Feig SA Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 20399656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India. Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years--what does the evidence mean for New Zealand? Baker S; Wall M; Bloomfield A N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1221):U1628. PubMed ID: 16138166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A quest for quality and economic effectiveness throughout the continuum of breast care. La Fargue MM; Coleman C Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):251-2. PubMed ID: 20392641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?]. Bick U Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography]. Iinuma T Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening, outside the population-screening program, of women from breast cancer families without proven BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations: a simulation study. Jacobi CE; Nagelkerke NJ; van Houwelingen JH; de Bock GH Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Mar; 15(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 16537697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Breast cancer screening lacking effectiveness]. Giard RW; Bonneux LG Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Nov; 145(46):2205-8. PubMed ID: 11757241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cost-effectiveness of mammography screening: evidence from a microsimulation model for New Zealand. Szeto KL; Devlin NJ Health Policy; 1996 Nov; 38(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 10160378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early detection of breast cancer in women. Humphrey LL; Ballard DJ Prim Care; 1989 Mar; 16(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 2495540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of "free" mammograms in motivating first-time screening: a community experiment. Scammon DL; Smith JA; Beard T J Ambul Care Mark; 1995; 6(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 10170371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care. Tice JA; Kerlikowske K Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A statistical evaluation of mammography: crucial questions for health systems. Watson CJ; Chesteen SA J Soc Health Syst; 1993; 4(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 8268470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening in relation to access to health services. Facione NC Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 May; 26(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 10337647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]