These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9421564)

  • 1. One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.
    Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Leibert TW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):785-96. PubMed ID: 9421564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.
    Nelson DL; Dyrdal GM; Goodmon LB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 16447386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new.
    Nelson DL; Zhang N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Dec; 7(4):604-17. PubMed ID: 11206201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretical implications of extralist probes for directed forgetting.
    Sahakyan L; Goodmon LB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):920-37. PubMed ID: 20565210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.
    Nelson DL; Fisher SL; Akirmak U
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1892-904. PubMed ID: 18265606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aging and the stability of activation and sampling in cued recall.
    McEvoy CL; Holley PE
    Psychol Aging; 1990 Dec; 5(4):589-96. PubMed ID: 2278685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.
    Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Wagner SR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 26282623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates?
    Cho KW; Neely JH; Brennan MK; Vitrano D; Crocco S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1768-1778. PubMed ID: 28394159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implicit processing in the cued recall of young and old adults.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL; Holley PE; Stelnicki GS
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 1388861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
    McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are test-expectancy effects better explained by changes in encoding strategies or differential test experience?
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 32940510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Item repetition and retrieval processes in cued recall: Analysis of recall-latency distributions.
    Jang Y; Lee H
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):792-815. PubMed ID: 30737728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age differences in encoding specificity.
    Puglisi JT; Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN
    J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P145-50. PubMed ID: 3183310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is this thing called frequency?
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):509-22. PubMed ID: 10946534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.
    Schreiber TA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 9610124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Organization of emotional memories in autobiographical memory].
    Fijałkowska A; Gruszczyński W
    Psychiatr Pol; 2009; 43(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 19725427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Release from generation failure: the role of study list structure.
    Higham PA; Tam H
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):148-57. PubMed ID: 16686114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.