These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9421784)

  • 1. Fracture strengths of three core restorative materials supported with or without a prefabricated split-shank post.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Dec; 78(6):560-5. PubMed ID: 9421784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Nov; 78(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 9399187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Condos S; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 8933438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the fracture resistance of core materials using different types of posts.
    Coltak KM; Yanikoğlu ND; Bayindir F
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Sep; 38(8):e511-6. PubMed ID: 17823676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration.
    Schmitter M; Lippenberger S; Rues S; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 20518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 9597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts.
    Cohen BI; Condos S; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 8003200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions.
    Kovarik RE; Breeding LC; Caughman WF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 1403934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro fracture resistance of teeth with dentin-bonded ceramic crowns and core build-ups.
    Lang M; McHugh S; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():88A-96A. PubMed ID: 14674507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs.
    Bolhuis HPB ; De Gee AJ; Feilzer AJ; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11803991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
    Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photoelastic stress analysis of different prefabricated post-and-core materials.
    Asvanund P; Morgano SM
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(5):684-90. PubMed ID: 21946489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shear bond strength of several new core materials.
    Levartovsky S; Goldstein GR; Georgescu M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Feb; 75(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 8667273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diametral tensile and compressive strengths of several types of core materials.
    Yüzügüllü B; Çiftçi Y; Saygılı G; Canay Ş
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 18194206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.