These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9422055)

  • 1. Strengthening experimental design by balancing potentially confounding variables across treatment groups.
    Zeller R; Good M; Anderson GC; Zeller DL
    Nurs Res; 1997; 46(6):345-9. PubMed ID: 9422055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three methods of random assignment: comparison of balance achieved on potentially confounding variables.
    Conlon M; Anderson GC
    Nurs Res; 1990; 39(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 2092314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilizing MOST frameworks and SMART designs for intervention research.
    Wilbur J; Kolanowski AM; Collins LM
    Nurs Outlook; 2016; 64(4):287-289. PubMed ID: 27262738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnitude and direction of missing confounders had different consequences on treatment effect estimation in propensity score analysis.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Fontaine C; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():87-97. PubMed ID: 28412467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balancing multiple baseline characteristics in randomized clinical trials.
    Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jul; 32(4):547-50. PubMed ID: 21382510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-group experimental designs.
    Brink PJ
    West J Nurs Res; 2003 Oct; 25(6):619-22. PubMed ID: 14528614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategies for conducting intervention research in schools.
    Frauman AC; Criswell ES; Harrell JS
    West J Nurs Res; 1998 Apr; 20(2):242-50. PubMed ID: 9550935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of randomized control trials in complementary therapies: exploring the issues.
    Richardson J
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 Aug; 32(2):398-406. PubMed ID: 10964188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of propensity scores using generalized additive models.
    Woo MJ; Reiter JP; Karr AF
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3805-16. PubMed ID: 18366144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In response to Spillane V., Byrne M.C., Byrne M., Leathem C.S., O'Malley M. & Cupples M.E. (2007) Monitoring treatment fidelity in a randomized trial of a complex intervention. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60(3), 343-352. Important considerations for standardizing complex interventions.
    Hawe P; Shiell A; Riley T
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Apr; 62(2):267. PubMed ID: 18394039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research challenges and lessons learned from a heart failure telehomecare study.
    Duffy JR; Hoskins LM
    Home Healthc Nurse; 2008 Jan; 26(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 18158496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drop-outs and a random regression model.
    Overall JE
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Jul; 7(3):383-402. PubMed ID: 9252832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causal inference in survival analysis using pseudo-observations.
    Andersen PK; Syriopoulou E; Parner ET
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(17):2669-2681. PubMed ID: 28384840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Up-front versus sequential randomizations for inference on adaptive treatment strategies.
    Ko JH; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(9):812-30. PubMed ID: 22362642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental designs.
    Behi R; Nolan M
    Br J Nurs; 1996 Jun 27-Jul 10; 5(12):754-6. PubMed ID: 8718332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues.
    Christie J; O'Halloran P; Stevenson M
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19289934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Procedures for testing the homogeneity of relative difference in sparse data.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):685-97. PubMed ID: 16007573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. INTERMED: a tool for controlling for confounding variables and designing multimodal treatment.
    Huyse FJ; de Jonge P; Lyons JS; Stiefel FC; Slaets JP
    J Psychosom Res; 1999 Apr; 46(4):401-2. PubMed ID: 10340241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A SMART design to optimize treatment strategies for patient and family caregiver outcomes.
    Song MK; DeVito Dabbs A; Ward SE
    Nurs Outlook; 2016; 64(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 27264454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li F; Turner EL; Heagerty PJ; Murray DM; Vollmer WM; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3791-3806. PubMed ID: 28786223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.