BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9423739)

  • 1. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 177(6):1385-90. PubMed ID: 9423739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1997; 26(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 9395971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation.
    Hankins GD; Miller DA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21278495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
    Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1587-8. PubMed ID: 11408896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
    Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Bailey RE
    Am Fam Physician; 2009 Dec; 80(12):1388-96. PubMed ID: 20000301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines.
    Macones GA; Hankins GD; Spong CY; Hauth J; Moore T
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2008; 37(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 18761565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Documentation improvements following multidisciplinary educational program on electronic fetal heart rate tracings.
    Vadnais MA; Golen TH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):741-4. PubMed ID: 21067288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: where are we now?
    Chez BF; Baird SM
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2011; 25(2):180-92; quiz 193-4. PubMed ID: 21540697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of the electronic fetal heart rate during labor.
    Sweha A; Hacker TW; Nuovo J
    Am Fam Physician; 1999 May; 59(9):2487-500. PubMed ID: 10323356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unselected low-risk pregnancies and the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring on umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy.
    Sameshima H; Ikenoue T; Ikeda T; Kamitomo M; Ibara S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 14749646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns during the first stage of labor: effect on perinatal outcome.
    Hadar A; Sheiner E; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):863-8. PubMed ID: 11641667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National standardization of fetal monitoring terminology and competency validation: a call for interdisciplinary collaboration.
    Vogler JH
    J Perinatol; 1997; 17(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 9210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic fetal monitoring: family medicine obstetrics.
    Rodney JR; Huntley BJ; Rodney WM
    Prim Care; 2012 Mar; 39(1):115-33. PubMed ID: 22309585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems.
    Gyamfi Bannerman C; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Blackwell S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):288.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22071068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal heart rate patterns and neurodevelopmental outcome in very low birth weight infants.
    Nisenblat V; Alon E; Barak S; Gonen R; Bader D; Ohel G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):792-6. PubMed ID: 16817075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: applying principles of patient safety.
    Miller DA; Miller LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 206(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 22000897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in fetal heart rate and uterine patterns associated with uterine rupture.
    Sheiner E; Levy A; Ofir K; Hadar A; Shoham-Vardi I; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M
    J Reprod Med; 2004 May; 49(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 15214711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AANA Journal course: advanced scientific concepts: update for nurse anesthetists--an introduction to fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Fiedler MA
    AANA J; 1989 Jun; 57(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 2672692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.