93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9424569)
21. Observational studies and randomized trials.
Kunz R; Khan KS; Neumayer HH
N Engl J Med; 2000 Oct; 343(16):1194-5; author reply 1196-7. PubMed ID: 11041757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
LeLorier J; Grégoire G; Benhaddad A; Lapierre J; Derderian F
N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):536-42. PubMed ID: 9262498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.
White IR; Thomas J
Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials.
Hewitt CE; Kumaravel B; Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1264-70. PubMed ID: 20573482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
Ferrer RL
Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Potential and pitfalls of randomized clinical trials in cancer research.
Buyse ME
Cancer Surv; 1989; 8(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 2804990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Revascularisation meta-analysis and randomisation.
Austin J
Anaesthesia; 2010 Feb; 65(2):211; author reply 211. PubMed ID: 20402852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Meta-analysis: an update.
Sacks HS; Reitman D; Pagano D; Kupelnick B
Mt Sinai J Med; 1996; 63(3-4):216-24. PubMed ID: 8692168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. What randomized trials and systematic reviews can offer decision makers.
Altman DG
Horm Res; 1999; 51 Suppl 1():36-43. PubMed ID: 10393490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Meta-analysis: should it be more than the sum of its parts?
Herbolsheimer P; Swain SM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Dec; 102(24):1817-9. PubMed ID: 21098760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga.
Jukola S
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2017 Apr; 62():35-41. PubMed ID: 28188111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Homoeopathy trials: going nowhere.
Vandenbroucke JP
Lancet; 1997 Sep; 350(9081):824. PubMed ID: 9310594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Mailed questionnaires: length matters.
Edwards P
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):214; author reply 214-5. PubMed ID: 15284329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Subjecting meta-analyses to closer scrutiny: Little support for differential efficacy among second-generation antipsychotics at equivalent doses.
Tandon R; Nasrallah HA
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2006 Aug; 63(8):935-7; author reply 937-9. PubMed ID: 16894070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews.
Vale CL; Tierney JF; Burdett S
BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f1798. PubMed ID: 23610376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Are treatment effects or adverse effects of significance for the association between financing and conclusions in randomized trials?].
Als-Nielsen BE; Chen W; Gluud CN; Gluud LL
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1676-8. PubMed ID: 15174406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
