93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9424569)
41. Metabias: a challenge for comparative effectiveness research.
Goodman S; Dickersin K
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 21727295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
Bent S; Kerlikowske K; Grady D
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):60; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparing results from meta-analyses vs large trials.
LeLorier J; Gregoire G
JAMA; 1998 Aug; 280(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 9707137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
Song FJ; Sheldon TA
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):60. PubMed ID: 9424564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
Sim I; Lavori P
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):61; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
Imperiale TF
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):61; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
Khan S; Williamson P; Sutton R
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):60-1; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods.
Friedrich JO; Adhikari NK; Beyene J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 21447428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Plastic surgery spin: suppressing clarity.
Freshwater MF
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 25618484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Prospectively identified trials could be used for comparison with meta-analyses.
Langhorne P
BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Seeing what you want to see in randomised controlled trials. Meta- analyses may suffer from interpretation bias too.
Lindbaek M
BMJ; 2000 Oct; 321(7268):1079. PubMed ID: 11053193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies.
Egger M; Schneider M; Davey Smith G
BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7125):140-4. PubMed ID: 9462324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Not PEDro's bias: summary quality scores can be used in meta-analysis.
Doi SA; Barendregt JJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):940-1. PubMed ID: 23651766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Meta-analyses Can Be Credible and Useful: A New Standard.
Ioannidis JP
JAMA Psychiatry; 2017 Apr; 74(4):311-312. PubMed ID: 28241194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Allocation concealment in clinical trials.
Jüni P; Egger M
JAMA; 2002 Nov; 288(19):2407-8; author reply 2408-9. PubMed ID: 12435252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Meta-analysis: greater than the sum of its parts?
Souter MJ; Signorini DF
Br J Anaesth; 1997 Oct; 79(4):420-1. PubMed ID: 9389255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. da Costa and colleagues' criticism of PEDro scores is not supported by the data.
Costa LO; Maher CG; Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Shiwa SR; Herbert RD; Sherrington C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1192-3. PubMed ID: 23849739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Meta-analyses, metaphysics, and reality.
Mandell BF
Cleve Clin J Med; 2008 Jun; 75(6):400. PubMed ID: 18595547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Concerns about run-in periods in randomized trials.
Glynn RJ; Buring JE; Hennekens CH
JAMA; 1998 May; 279(19):1526; author reply 1527. PubMed ID: 9605892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
