196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9425502)
1. Precision and accuracy of computed digital absorptiometry for assessment of bone density of the hand.
Bouxsein ML; Michaeli DA; Plass DB; Schick DA; Melton ME
Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 9425502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new X-ray based osteoporosis screening tool provides accurate and precise assessment of phalanx bone mineral content.
Michaeli DA; Mirshahi A; Singer J; Rapa FG; Plass DB; Bouxsein ML
J Clin Densitom; 1999; 2(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 23547310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed digital absorptiometry for measurement of phalangeal bone mineral mass on a slot-scanning digital radiography system.
Dendere R; Whiley SP; Douglas TS
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Nov; 25(11):2625-30. PubMed ID: 24985712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone densitometry of the forearm: comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Eckert P; Casez JP; Thiébaud D; Schnyder P; Burckhardt P
Bone; 1996 Jun; 18(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 8805999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic absorptiometry for bone mineral measurement of the phalanges: precision and accuracy study.
Yang SO; Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Dhillon MS; Guglielmi G; Bendavid EJ; Soejima O; Nelson DL; Genant HK
Radiology; 1994 Sep; 192(3):857-9. PubMed ID: 8058960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data.
Kelly TL; Crane G; Baran DT
Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8055369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of hand bone mineral content by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: development of the method, and its application in normal volunteers and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Deodhar AA; Brabyn J; Jones PW; Davis MJ; Woolf AD
Ann Rheum Dis; 1994 Oct; 53(10):685-90. PubMed ID: 7979583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and precision of bone mineral density and bone mineral content in excised rat humeri using fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Kastl S; Sommer T; Klein P; Hohenberger W; Engelke K
Bone; 2002 Jan; 30(1):243-6. PubMed ID: 11792592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry.
Borg J; Møllgaard A; Riis BJ
Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 8800788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of bone densitometry of the phalanges, distal forearm and axial skeleton in early postmenopausal women participating in the EPIC Study.
Ravn P; Overgaard K; Huang C; Ross PD; Green D; McClung M
Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 8883120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precision and accuracy of a transportable dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry unit for bone mineral measurements in guinea pigs.
Fink C; Cooper HJ; Huebner JL; Guilak F; Kraus VB
Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Mar; 70(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11907713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of reference point selection on DXA-based measurement of forearm bone mineral density.
Yu W; Ying Q; Guan W; Lin Q; Zhang Z; Chen J; Engelke K; Hsieh E
Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Nov; 14(1):107. PubMed ID: 31707587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Instrumental diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Rossini M; Viapiana O; Adami S
Aging (Milano); 1998 Jun; 10(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 9801734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spine deformity index in osteoporotic women: relations to forearm and vertebral bone mineral measurements and to iliac crest ash density.
Søgaard CH; Hermann AP; Hasling C; Mosekilde L; Mosekilde L
Osteoporos Int; 1994 Jul; 4(4):211-9. PubMed ID: 7949751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
