These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9425578)

  • 1. Choice of instrument for vaginal delivery.
    Johanson R
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 9(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9425578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Forceps delivery or vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Maillet R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):81. PubMed ID: 17208499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction--a review of 200 cases.
    Achanna S; Monga D
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 7761886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operative and assisted delivery.
    Robertson P
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 3(6):769-72. PubMed ID: 1818713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S; Glezerman M; Baider C; Sadan O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obstetric attending physician characteristics and their impact on vacuum and forceps delivery rates: University of California at San Francisco experience from 1977 to 1999.
    Chang AL; Noah MS; Laros RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1299-303. PubMed ID: 12066112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mounting rate of cesarean sections. Is it accompanied by a drop in instrumental births?
    Gharaibeh AM; Al-Bdour AE; Akasheh HF
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Feb; 29(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 18246239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Forceps verses vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1208. PubMed ID: 17127090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury.
    Damron DP; Capeless EL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 15467563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cord blood acid-base status in neonates delivered by Silastic vacuum cup extraction: comparison with forceps and spontaneous deliveries.
    Gray DL; Nelson DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 3122140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Residency Training on Operative Vaginal Delivery in Independent Practice.
    Andrews SE; Allshouse AA; Moore GS; Alston MJ; Metz TD
    J Reprod Med; 2016; 61(11-12):562-8. PubMed ID: 30226705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National variations in operative vaginal deliveries in Ireland.
    Daly N; Bonham S; O'Dwyer V; O'Connor C; Kent E; Turner MJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 24709535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of outcomes between operative vaginal deliveries and spontaneous vaginal deliveries in southeast Nigeria.
    Lawani LO; Anozie OB; Ezeonu PO; Iyoke CA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 24717812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Forceps delivery or vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Schaal JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 17208497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Silastic cup vacuum extractor or forceps: a comparative study.
    Svigos JM; Cave DG; Vigneswaran R; Resch A; Christiansen J
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Dec; 16(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2099728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occurrence and predictors of vacuum and forceps used sequentially for vaginal birth.
    Xie RH; Cao H; Hong B; Sprague AE; Walker M; Wu Wen S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Apr; 35(4):317-322. PubMed ID: 23660038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Assisted vaginal delivery using the vacuum extractor in frank breech presentation].
    Broche DE; Riethmuller D; Maticot-Baptista D; Ramanah R; Cossa S; Maillet R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Apr; 37(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 18023998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [French residents' training in instrumental deliveries: A national survey].
    Saunier C; Raimond E; Dupont A; Pelissier A; Bonneau S; Gabriel R; Graesslin O
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1186-1193. PubMed ID: 27312098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.