These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9425678)
1. Why is the alphabetically middle letter in a multiletter array so hard to determine? Memory processes in linear-order information processing. Jou J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1743-63. PubMed ID: 9425678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Same-different judgments of multiletter strings: insensitivity to positional bias and spacing. Proctor RW; Healy AF; Van Zandt T Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jan; 49(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 2011454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recognition time for letters and nonletters: effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. Mason M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):724-38. PubMed ID: 6218232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Order-relevant and order-irrelevant decision rules in multiletter matching. Proctor RW; Healy AF J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1985 Jul; 11(3):519-37. PubMed ID: 3160814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why search for target absence is so slow (and careful!): the more targets there are, the more likely you are to miss one. Krueger LE; Shapiro RG J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):662-85. PubMed ID: 6449536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Representation of linear orders. Taylor DA; Kim JO; Sudevan P J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jan; 10(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 6242736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Basic processes in reading: the effect of interletter spacing. Risko EF; Lanthier SN; Besner D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1449-57. PubMed ID: 21787106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On time differences in searching for letters in words and nonwords: do they emerge during the initial encoding or the subsequent scan? Johnson NF; Carnot MJ Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2314225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An investigation of the role of grapheme units in word recognition. Lupker SJ; Acha J; Davis CJ; Perea M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1491-516. PubMed ID: 22309089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal order of strokes primes letter recognition. Parkinson J; Khurana B Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1265-74. PubMed ID: 17676557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Memory retrieval tasks determine the serial position curves of linear orders with categorical structures. Jou J Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(4):525-65. PubMed ID: 16402745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect. Saint-Aubin J; Klein RM; Roy-Charland A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1191-210. PubMed ID: 14640838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Letter string processing and visual short-term memory. Ktori M; Grainger J; Dufau S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 21958206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual and phonetic codes and the process of generation in letter matching. Boles DB; Eveland DC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Oct; 9(5):657-74. PubMed ID: 6227685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple number and letter comparison: directionality and accessibility in numeric and alphabetic memories. Jou J Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(4):543-79. PubMed ID: 14723244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]