These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9425680)

  • 1. Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search.
    Zenger B; Fahle M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1783-91. PubMed ID: 9425680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competitive guided search: meeting the challenge of benchmark RT distributions.
    Moran R; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ; Usher M
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23887047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response-time evidence for mixed memory states in a sequential-presentation change-detection task.
    Nosofsky RM; Donkin C
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Feb; 84():31-62. PubMed ID: 26706291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GSDT: An integrative model of visual search.
    Schwarz W; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1654-75. PubMed ID: 27336631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Serial correlations and 1/f power spectra in visual search reaction times.
    McIlhagga W
    J Vis; 2008 Jul; 8(9):5.1-14. PubMed ID: 18831641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search.
    Poisson ME; Wilkinson F
    Perception; 1992; 21(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 1528701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Haptic pop-out in a hand sweep.
    Plaisier MA; Bergmann Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):368-77. PubMed ID: 18471795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing target detection errors in visual search and manually-assisted search.
    Solman GJ; Hickey K; Smilek D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):945-58. PubMed ID: 24554230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preattentive and focal attentional processes in schizophrenia: a visual search study.
    Mori S; Tanaka G; Ayaka Y; Michitsuji S; Niwa H; Uemura M; Ohta Y
    Schizophr Res; 1996 Oct; 22(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 8908692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial context learning in visual search and change detection.
    Jiang Y; Song JH
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1128-39. PubMed ID: 16502835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional mechanisms in simple visual detection: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.
    Liu CC; Wolfgang BJ; Smith PL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1329-45. PubMed ID: 19803640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mirror effect and mixture signal detection theory.
    DeCarlo LT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 17201552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of target probability on pre-stimulus brain activity.
    Lucci G; Berchicci M; Perri RL; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():121-8. PubMed ID: 26912279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. False feedback increases detection of low-prevalence targets in visual search.
    Schwark J; Sandry J; Macdonald J; Dolgov I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1583-9. PubMed ID: 22864899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.
    Moran R; Zehetleitner M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ; Usher M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 26635097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target-present guessing as a function of target prevalence and accumulated information in visual search.
    Peltier C; Becker MW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 28185227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting for false alarms in a simple reaction time task.
    Tiefenau A; Neubauer H; von Specht H; Heil P
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1122(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 17027935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.
    Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Van Wert MJ; Kenner NM; Place SS; Kibbi N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Nov; 136(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 17999575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry.
    Dosher BA; Han S; Lu ZL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 14769065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.