These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9425683)

  • 1. Dependence by any other name smells just as sweet: reply to van der Velde and van der Heijden (1997).
    Johnston JC; Ruthruff E; Monheit M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1813-8. PubMed ID: 9425683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the statistical independence of color and shape in object identification.
    van der Velde F; van der Heijden AH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1798-812. PubMed ID: 9425682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial attention to arrays of multidimensional objects.
    Monheit MA; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Aug; 20(4):691-708. PubMed ID: 8083629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is position "special" in visual attention? Evidence that top-down processes guide visual selection.
    Gold JM; Pratt J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 11605561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial attention facilitates selection of illusory objects: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Martínez A; Teder-Salejarvi W; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1139():143-52. PubMed ID: 17288996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attending to an object's color entails attending to its location: support for location-special views of visual attention.
    Tsal Y; Lamy D
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):960-8. PubMed ID: 10997042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional spreading in object-based attention.
    Richard AM; Lee H; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 18665730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of inattention on form perception.
    Rock I; Gutman D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Apr; 7(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 6453922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of unattended features on object processing depends on task demand.
    Mayer KM; Vuong QC
    Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 56():20-7. PubMed ID: 22306678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of selective attention on perceptual filling-in.
    De Weerd P; Smith E; Greenberg P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 18(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 16513000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parallel and serial processes in visual search.
    Thornton TL; Gilden DL
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):71-103. PubMed ID: 17227182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similarity between Fourier transforms of objects predicts their experimental confusions.
    Vol IA; Pavlovskaja MB; Bondarko VM
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 2300420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Object discrimination by pigeons: effects of object color and shape.
    Lazareva OF; Vecera SP; Levin J; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2005 Apr; 69(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 15795067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words.
    Tzelgov J; Henik A; Berger J
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):727-35. PubMed ID: 1435275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Priming effect as related to difficulty in selection for overlapping stimuli manipulated by the relative line thickness of attended and unattended figures.
    Kobari H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1219-30. PubMed ID: 9700798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct cognitive mechanisms involved in the processing of single objects and object ensembles.
    Cant JS; Sun SZ; Xu Y
    J Vis; 2015; 15(4):12. PubMed ID: 26360156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.
    Yantis S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Jun; 19(3):676-81. PubMed ID: 8331320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention enhances feature integration.
    Paul L; Schyns PG
    Vision Res; 2003 Aug; 43(17):1793-8. PubMed ID: 12826102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corrigendum.
    J Dent Res; 2017 Aug; 96(9):1067. PubMed ID: 28677998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.