These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9426163)

  • 1. The application of thermoelastic analysis to study stresses in human teeth.
    Meredith N; Setchell DJ; Swanson SA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):813-22. PubMed ID: 9426163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth.
    Meredith N; Setchell DJ
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):331-7. PubMed ID: 9175365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations.
    Pilo R; Brosh T; Chweidan H
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):467-72. PubMed ID: 9699439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations.
    Reel DC; Mitchell RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 2654362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
    Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal ridge strength of restored teeth with modified Class II cavity preparations.
    Covey D; Schulein TM; Kohout FJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Feb; 118(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 2918151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro fracture resistance of molar teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composite material.
    Fráter M; Forster A; Keresztúri M; Braunitzer G; Nagy K
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 24859462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
    al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II bonded composite resin.
    Eakle WS
    J Dent Res; 1986 Feb; 65(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 3511111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Lacy AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 1501170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.