These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9426511)

  • 1. Automated primary screening for gynecologic cytology. The time has not yet come.
    Stanley MW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jan; 109(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 9426511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategies for improving gynecologic cytology screening.
    Renshaw AA
    Cancer; 2009 Jun; 117(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 19618478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Medical and legal complications].
    Pierre F; Soutoul JH
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(5):516-9. PubMed ID: 7983313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An approach to the problem of false negatives in gynecologic cytologic screening.
    Hindman WM
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):814-8. PubMed ID: 2686323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computerized screening devices and performance assessment: development of a policy towards automation. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Hutchinson ML; Gahm T; Grohs HK; Gwi-Mak E; Kaufman EA; Kaufman RH; Knight BK; Koss LG; Magruder LE; Mango LJ; McCallum SM; Melamed MR; Peebles A; Richart RM; Robinowitz M; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Schenck U; Tanaka N; Topalidis T; Verhest AP; Wertlake PT; Wilbur DC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 9479324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Gynecological screening or cervical screening? Conflicts between clinical and public health viewpoints].
    Döbrőssy L; Kovács A; Budai A; Cornides A
    Orv Hetil; 2012 Aug; 153(33):1302-13. PubMed ID: 22890177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance in gynecologic cytology. What is practical?
    Rohr LR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Dec; 94(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 2244593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Automation in diagnostic cytology (author's transl)].
    Giacomini G; Marotta R
    Pathologica; 1981; 73(1023):3-10. PubMed ID: 6171766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation model for gynecologic specimen classification in a high-resolution prescreening system.
    Ott R
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1984 Dec; 6(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 6397085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of costs and benefits of advances in cytologic technology. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Melamed MR; Hutchinson ML; Kaufman EA; Schechter CB; Garner D; Kobler TP; Krieger PA; Reith A; Schenck U
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 9479325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computerized training and proficiency testing. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Vooijs GP; Davey DD; Somrak TM; Goodell RM; Grohs DH; Knesel EA; Mango LJ; Mui KK; Nielsen ML; Wilbur DC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 9479333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cytology requisition log-in with a minimum of keyboard entry.
    Aller RD; Rusnak G; DeWitt C
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(4):497-8. PubMed ID: 8042411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated cytology. The state of the art.
    Goerttler K; Stöhr M
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1982 Dec; 106(13):657-61. PubMed ID: 6753792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Automation in the cytodiagnostic central laboratory (to meet the high requirements of obligatory gynecologic cytodiagnosis)].
    Jaugitz H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(23):1426-9. PubMed ID: 797177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized quality assurance in nongynecologic cytology.
    Hayes JA; Duren L
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(5):1114-5. PubMed ID: 8842187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cost of production in cervical cytology: comparison of conventional and automated primary screening systems.
    Bishop JW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Apr; 107(4):445-50. PubMed ID: 9124213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Trends in the development of the cytological cervical screening].
    Kostova P; Zlatkov V
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 15341258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liquid based cytology: a new cervical screening system for the UK.
    Wall A
    J Fam Health Care; 2005; 15(3):90-2. PubMed ID: 16094904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer patterns with automation-assisted and conventional cytological screening: a randomized study.
    Anttila A; Pokhrel A; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Hakama M; Malila N; Nieminen P
    Int J Cancer; 2011 Mar; 128(5):1204-12. PubMed ID: 20848590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.