150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9426712)
1. Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Raboy A; Ferzli G; Albert P
Urology; 1997 Dec; 50(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 9426712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Raboy A; Albert P; Ferzli G
Surg Endosc; 1998 Oct; 12(10):1264-7. PubMed ID: 9745069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures.
Stolzenburg JU; Do M; Rabenalt R; Pfeiffer H; Horn L; Truss MC; Jonas U; Dorschner W
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2066-71. PubMed ID: 12771721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (report of 5 cases)].
Gao ZL; Wu JT; Wang JM; Men CP; Zhang P; Wang L; Shi L; Sun DK
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Oct; 12(10):930-2. PubMed ID: 17121027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Invasion of seminal vesicles by adenocarcinoma of the prostate: PSA outcome determined by preoperative and postoperative factors.
Bloom KD; Richie JP; Schultz D; Renshaw A; Saegaert T; D'amico AV
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 14972484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Phinthusophon K; Nualyong C; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Amornvesukij T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Dec; 90(12):2644-50. PubMed ID: 18386715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radical endoscopic assisted perineal prostatectomy.
Ellison LM; Pinto PA; Kavoussi LR
J Urol; 2003 Jul; 170(1):170-3. PubMed ID: 12796673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial perioperative and pathologic results.
Humphreys MR; Sauer JS; Ryan AR; Leslie KO; Castle EP; Lingeman JE; Andrews PE
Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1211-7. PubMed ID: 21996106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases.
Rozet F; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Cathala N; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):908-11. PubMed ID: 16093985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vesicourethral anastomosis during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison between the single-knot running and interrupted technique.
Poulakis V; Skriapas K; de Vries R; Dillenburg W; Witzsch U; Becht E
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1284-9. PubMed ID: 17141837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases.
Rassweiler J; Sentker L; Seemann O; Hatzinger M; Rumpelt HJ
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2101-8. PubMed ID: 11696715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of previous surgery on endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.
Stolzenburg JU; Ho KM; Do M; Rabenalt R; Dorschner W; Truss MC
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 15708047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Remzi M; Klingler HC; Tinzl MV; Fong YK; Lodde M; Kiss B; Marberger M
Eur Urol; 2005 Jul; 48(1):83-9; discussion 89. PubMed ID: 15967256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
