These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9426775)

  • 1. Objective scoring of animal handling and stunning practices at slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1998 Jan; 212(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 9426775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of animal welfare audits of slaughter plants by a major fast food company on cattle handling and stunning practices.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2000 Mar; 216(6):848-51. PubMed ID: 22570895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Solving return-to-sensibility problems after electrical stunning in commercial pork slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2001 Sep; 219(5):608-11. PubMed ID: 11549087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Welfare of cattle during slaughter and the prevention of nonambulatory (downer) cattle.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2001 Nov; 219(10):1377-82. PubMed ID: 11724172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Return-to-sensibility problems after penetrating captive bolt stunning of cattle in commercial beef slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2002 Nov; 221(9):1258-61. PubMed ID: 12418689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maintenance of good animal welfare standards in beef slaughter plants by use of auditing programs.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2005 Feb; 226(3):370-3. PubMed ID: 15702685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cattle vocalizations are associated with handling and equipment problems at beef slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    Appl Anim Behav Sci; 2001 Mar; 71(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 11230900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making slaughterhouses more humane for cattle, pigs, and sheep.
    Grandin T
    Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2013 Jan; 1():491-512. PubMed ID: 25387029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of cattle welfare at a commercial slaughter plant in the northwest of Mexico.
    Miranda-de la Lama GC; Leyva IG; Barreras-Serrano A; Pérez-Linares C; Sánchez-López E; María GA; Figueroa-Saavedra F
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2012 Mar; 44(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 21789548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditing animal welfare at slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 20599326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survey of humane organizations and slaughter plants regarding experiences with Vietnamese potbellied pigs.
    Lord LK; Wittum TE
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1997 Sep; 211(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 9290820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Observations on abattoir personnel on the use of prodding sticks on slaughter pigs in the entrance area of the restrainer].
    Schäffer D; von Borell E; Laube RB
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1997 Nov; 104(11):487-9. PubMed ID: 9471418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of exsanguination blood lactate to assess the quality of pre-slaughter pig handling.
    Edwards LN; Grandin T; Engle TE; Porter SP; Ritter MJ; Sosnicki AA; Anderson DB
    Meat Sci; 2010 Oct; 86(2):384-90. PubMed ID: 20566249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Head-only followed by cardiac arrest electrical stunning is an effective alternative to head-only electrical stunning in pigs.
    Vogel KD; Badtram G; Claus JR; Grandin T; Turpin S; Weyker RE; Voogd E
    J Anim Sci; 2011 May; 89(5):1412-8. PubMed ID: 21183712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning - a survey of stunner placement under practical conditions.
    Fries R; Schrohe K; Lotz F; Arndt G
    Animal; 2012 Jul; 6(7):1124-8. PubMed ID: 23031473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. USDA encourages humane slaughter of animals.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Nov; 33(10):14-5. PubMed ID: 15514646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods.
    Neves JE; Paranhos da Costa MJ; Roça RO; Faucitano L; Gregory NG
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jul; 117():41-3. PubMed ID: 26946474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experiences with the supervision of electric stunning of slaughter swine and the technical evaluation of stunning equipment in the government district of Weser-Ems].
    Boosen M; Roming L
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1993 Feb; 100(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 8462423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Physiologic reactions during the slaughter of cattle and sheep with and without stunning].
    Kallweit E; Ellendorf F; Daly C; Smidt D
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1989 Mar; 96(3):89-92. PubMed ID: 2651084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioural and physiological reactions of cattle in a commercial abattoir: relationships with organisational aspects of the abattoir and animal characteristics.
    Bourguet C; Deiss V; Tannugi CC; Terlouw EM
    Meat Sci; 2011 May; 88(1):158-68. PubMed ID: 21236588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.