These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. HHS trying to patch up holes in PRO program. Firshein J Hospitals; 1986 Sep; 60(17):24. PubMed ID: 3527935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Professional review of health care services. Reynolds MM Health Soc Work; 1976 Nov; 1(4):38-60. PubMed ID: 791772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Current public policy and medical care evaluation. McCormack JJ Health Care Dimen; 1975; ():47-59. PubMed ID: 1053258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation. Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 Aug; 1(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 2980883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. PSROs to focus on use of hospital services. Smits H Hosp Peer Rev; 1979 Nov; 4(11):147. PubMed ID: 10273175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. DHHS Office of Inspector General: an overview. Hsia D R I Med J (1976); 1989 Feb; 72(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 2928684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Quality improvement to be key step for Bowen, HHS chief of staff says. Burke TR Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1986; 19(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 10276983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. HEW halts funding for Tennessee PSRO. Am Med News; 1978 Oct; 21(41):1, 22. PubMed ID: 10273096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. HHS to institute new prospective PSRO payment system July 1. Johnson EM Health Law Vigil; 1981 Apr; 4(7):9-10. PubMed ID: 10273246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Court invalidates attempts by HHS to implement PRO program without formal rulemaking. Tomaselli LA Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 10276711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. PROs likely to emerge as the watchdog of new payment system. Aronson P; Hellow J Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(3):50-2. PubMed ID: 10273351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. AHA seeks ancillary relief in photocopying case. Rothschild IS Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jan; 11(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 10285310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Views of PSROs on disclosure of data. Response to the DHEW draft transmittal. Bussman JW QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1977 Nov; 3(11):9-10, 26. PubMed ID: 413083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]