These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9428084)

  • 1. The comparability and reliability of five health-state valuation methods.
    Krabbe PF; Essink-Bot ML; Bonsel GJ
    Soc Sci Med; 1997 Dec; 45(11):1641-52. PubMed ID: 9428084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population.
    Kim SH; Lee SI; Jo MW
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3387-3397. PubMed ID: 28801862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overcoming inherent problems of preference-based techniques for measuring health benefits: an empirical study in the context of kidney transplantation.
    Kontodimopoulos N; Niakas D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jan; 6():3. PubMed ID: 16412242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility, validity and test-retest reliability of scaling methods for health states: the visual analogue scale and the time trade-off.
    Badia X; Monserrat S; Roset M; Herdman M
    Qual Life Res; 1999 Jun; 8(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 10472162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries.
    Lin MR; Hwang HF; Chung KP; Huang C; Chen CY
    Phys Ther; 2006 Mar; 86(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 16506870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is it going to be, TTO or SG? A direct test of the validity of health state valuation.
    Lipman SA; Brouwer WBF; Attema AE
    Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 32744408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs.
    Bleichrodt H; Johannesson M
    J Health Econ; 1997 Apr; 16(2):155-75. PubMed ID: 10169092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do medical house officers value the health of veterans differently from the health of non-veterans?
    Yi MS; Luckhaupt S; Mrus JM; Tsevat J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 Apr; 2():19. PubMed ID: 15070409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing health utilities in schizophrenia. A feasibility study.
    Voruganti LN; Awad AG; Oyewumi LK; Cortese L; Zirul S; Dhawan R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 Mar; 17(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 10947302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data.
    Salomon JA
    Popul Health Metr; 2003 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 14687419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning effects in time trade-off based valuation of EQ-5D health states.
    Augestad LA; Rand-Hendriksen K; Kristiansen IS; Stavem K
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 22433766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
    Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity, feasibility and acceptability of time trade-off and standard gamble assessments in health valuation studies: a study in a multiethnic Asian population in Singapore.
    Wee HL; Li SC; Xie F; Zhang XH; Luo N; Feeny D; Cheung YB; Machin D; Fong KY; Thumboo J
    Value Health; 2008 Mar; 11 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 18387064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient utilities in chronic musculoskeletal pain: how useful is the standard gamble method?
    Goossens ME; Vlaeyen JW; Rutten-van Mölken MP; van der Linden SM
    Pain; 1999 Mar; 80(1-2):365-75. PubMed ID: 10204750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health values of patients with systemic sclerosis.
    Khanna D; Ahmed M; Furst DE; Ginsburg SS; Park GS; Hornung R; Tsevat J
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Feb; 57(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17266070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health utility bias: a systematic review and meta-analytic evaluation.
    Doctor JN; Bleichrodt H; Lin HJ
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 18556637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale.
    Rowen D; Brazier J; Van Hout B
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):328-40. PubMed ID: 25398621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How dead is dead? Qualitative findings from participants of combined traditional and lead-time time trade-off valuations.
    Al Sayah F; Mladenovic A; Gaebel K; Xie F; Johnson JA
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Jan; 25(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26216584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Derive Health State Utilities from Ordinal Preference Data.
    Reddy BP; Adams R; Walsh C; Barry M; Kind P
    Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 26409612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.