BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

26 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9428351)

  • 1. Comparative genomic hybridization in acute myeloid leukemia. A comparison with G-banding and chromosome painting.
    Nacheva E; Grace C; Holloway TL; Green AR
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1995 Jul; 82(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 7627945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of breast cancer polyclonality by combined chromosome banding and comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
    Teixeira MR; Tsarouha H; Kraggerud SM; Pandis N; Dimitriadis E; Andersen JA; Lothe RA; Heim S
    Neoplasia; 2001; 3(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 11494114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complete cytogenetic characterization of the human breast cancer cell line MA11 combining G-banding, comparative genomic hybridization, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization, RxFISH, and chromosome-specific painting.
    Micci F; Teixeira MR; Heim S
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Nov; 131(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 11734314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
    Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
    Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined study of prostatic carcinoma by classical cytogenetic analysis and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Verdorfer I; Hobisch A; Culig Z; Hittmair A; Bartsch G; Erdel M; Duba HC; Utermann G
    Int J Oncol; 2001 Dec; 19(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 11713598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative genomic hybridization: a comparison with molecular and cytogenetic analysis.
    Nacheva EP; Grace CD; Bittner M; Ledbetter DH; Jenkins RB; Green AR
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1998 Jan; 100(2):93-105. PubMed ID: 9428351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical applications of array CGH and the transformation of clinical cytogenetics.
    Shaffer LG; Bejjani BA
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2006; 115(3-4):303-9. PubMed ID: 17124414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined karyotyping, CGH and M-FISH analysis allows detailed characterization of unidentified chromosomal rearrangements in Merkel cell carcinoma.
    Van Gele M; Leonard JH; Van Roy N; Van Limbergen H; Van Belle S; Cocquyt V; Salwen H; De Paepe A; Speleman F
    Int J Cancer; 2002 Sep; 101(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 12209990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnosis of cryptic chromosome aberrations].
    Ness GO; Houge G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 Sep; 123(17):2418-21. PubMed ID: 14562774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chromosomal imbalances in oral squamous cell carcinoma: examination of 31 cell lines and review of the literature.
    Martin CL; Reshmi SC; Ried T; Gottberg W; Wilson JW; Reddy JK; Khanna P; Johnson JT; Myers EN; Gollin SM
    Oral Oncol; 2008 Apr; 44(4):369-82. PubMed ID: 17681875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cytogenetic analysis from DNA by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tachdjian G; Aboura A; Lapierre JM; Viguié F
    Ann Genet; 2000; 43(3-4):147-54. PubMed ID: 11164197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative genomic hybridization. A screening method in genetic tumor diagnosis].
    Petersen I; Schwendel A; Bockmühl U; Dietel M
    Pathologe; 1996 Sep; 17(5):333-41. PubMed ID: 8992475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.