BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9429268)

  • 1. Biomechanics of oral implants: a review of the literature.
    Duyck J; Naert IE; Van Oosterwyck H; Van der Sloten J; De Cooman M; Lievens S; Puers B
    Technol Health Care; 1997 Oct; 5(4):253-73. PubMed ID: 9429268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of implant diameter on surrounding bone.
    Brink J; Meraw SJ; Sarment DP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 17590162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.
    Geng JP; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 11404759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Load transfer by fine threading the implant neck--a FEM study.
    Rahimi A; Bourauel C; Jager A; Gedrange T; Heinemann F
    J Physiol Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 60 Suppl 8():107-12. PubMed ID: 20400802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone.
    Isidor F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():8-18. PubMed ID: 16968378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo horizontal bending moments on implants.
    Richter EJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):232-44. PubMed ID: 9581410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical study of a prosthetic solution based on an angled abutment: case of upper lateral incisor.
    Dubois G; Daas M; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):989-98. PubMed ID: 17158084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.