These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9429268)

  • 21. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 32(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 15790383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of strain at low-frequency loading on peri-implant bone (re)modelling: a guinea-pig experimental study.
    De Smet E; Jaecques SV; Jansen JJ; Walboomers F; Vander Sloten J; Naert IE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):733-9. PubMed ID: 18492084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
    Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Hsu ML; Chen FC; Kao HC; Cheng CK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17465356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of compromised cortical bone on implant load distribution.
    Akça K; Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):616-20. PubMed ID: 18798784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Histodynamics of bone tissue formation around immediately loaded cylindrical implants in the rabbit.
    Vandamme K; Naert I; Geris L; Sloten JV; Puers R; Duyck J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):471-80. PubMed ID: 17517061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
    Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fixation of 5-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures and resulting bone loading: a finite element assessment based on in vivo strain measurements.
    Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):756-62. PubMed ID: 17066637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical and histologic features of a nonaxial load on the osseointegration of a posterior mandibular implant: report of a case.
    Piattelli A; Scarano A; Paolantonio M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):273-5. PubMed ID: 9581414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.
    Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
    Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Success or failure of dental implants? A literature review with treatment considerations.
    Porter JA; von Fraunhofer JA
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):423-32; quiz 433, 446. PubMed ID: 16366052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.