These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9430545)

  • 1. Statistical aspects of the normal visual field in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Cubbidge RP; Pacey IE; Robinson R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Jan; 39(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 9430545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrasting blue-on-yellow with white-on-white visual fields: Roles of visual adaptation for healthy peri- or postmenopausal women younger than 70 years of age.
    Eisner A; Toomey MD; Incognito LJ; O'malley JP; Samples JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5605-14. PubMed ID: 17122155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Variability of sensitivity thresholds in short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in the central vision field].
    Polo Llorens V; Larrosa Poves JM; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez L; Rojo Aragües A; Cuevas Andrés R; Ruiz Moreno O; Honrubia López FM
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 11151125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; Hancock SA; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1152-61. PubMed ID: 10235548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients.
    Hutchings N; Hosking SL; Wild JM; Flanagan JG
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Sep; 42(10):2332-7. PubMed ID: 11527947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss.
    Wild JM; Moss ID; Whitaker D; O'Neill EC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1398-410. PubMed ID: 7775118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical modelling of the central 10-degree visual field in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Cubbidge RP; Hosking SL; Embleton S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):650-7. PubMed ID: 12192459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of age-related cataract on blue-on-yellow perimetry.
    Moss ID; Wild JM; Whitaker DJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Apr; 36(5):764-73. PubMed ID: 7706024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice.
    Demirel S; Johnson CA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Aug; 67(8):451-6. PubMed ID: 8888875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in subjects with suspected glaucoma (I): assessment of sensitivity thresholds].
    Polo Llorens V; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez LE; Larrosa Poves JM; Abecia Martínez E; Cuevas Andrés R; Rojo Aragües A; Honrubia López FM
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 11151126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry].
    Qi S; Jiang Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11955298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Perimetric probability maps for short wavelength automated perimetry].
    Polo Llorens V ; Larrosa Poves JM ; Pinilla Lozano I ; Pablo Júlvez L ; Honrubia López FM
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Jun; 75(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 11151185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry.
    Lachenmayr BJ; Kojetinsky S; Ostermaier N; Angstwurm K; Vivell PM; Schaumberger M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 May; 35(6):2741-8. PubMed ID: 8188467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients.
    Bengtsson B; Hellgren KJ; Agardh E
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17935606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.