152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9431313)
1. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with colorectal carcinoma. A basis for checklists.
Compton CC; Henson DE; Hutter RV; Sobin LH; Bowman HE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1247-54. PubMed ID: 9431313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with gastric carcinoma: a basis for checklists. Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists, and the Task Force for Protocols on the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Gastric Cancer.
Compton C; Sobin LH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jan; 122(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 9448011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a basis for checklists. Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists.
Compton CC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jul; 121(7):673-7. PubMed ID: 9240900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with colorectal carcinoma. A basis for checklists. Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists. Task Force for Protocols on the Examination of Specimens from Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Henson DE; Hutter RV; Sobin LH; Bowman HE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Feb; 118(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 8311648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a new classification system for curatively resected colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Sternberg A; Sibirsky O; Cohen D; Blumenson LE; Petrelli NJ
Cancer; 1999 Sep; 86(5):782-92. PubMed ID: 10463976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined.
Cianchi F; Palomba A; Boddi V; Messerini L; Pucciani F; Perigli G; Bechi P; Cortesini C
World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 11865379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.
Jha MK; Corbett WA; Wilson RG; Koreli A; Papagrigoriadis S
Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 17159746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist.
Mohanty SK; Piccoli AL; Devine LJ; Patel AA; William GC; Winters SB; Becich MJ; Parwani AV
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jul; 7():144. PubMed ID: 17672904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metastatic lymph node size and colorectal cancer prognosis.
Dhar DK; Yoshimura H; Kinukawa N; Maruyama R; Tachibana M; Kohno H; Kubota H; Nagasue N
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jan; 200(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 15631916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential expression of alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase in colorectal carcinoma bears clinical and pathologic significance.
Lin A; Weiser MR; Klimstra DS; Paty PB; Tang LH; Al-Ahmadie H; Hoo Park S; Guillem JG; Temple L; Wong WD; Gerald WL; Shia J
Hum Pathol; 2007 Jun; 38(6):850-6. PubMed ID: 17442371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How many lymph nodes should be examined in Dukes' B colorectal cancer? Determination on the basis of cumulative survival rate.
Yoshimatsu K; Ishibashi K; Umehara A; Yokomizo H; Yoshida K; Fujimoto T; Watanabe K; Ogawa K
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(66):1703-6. PubMed ID: 16334761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.
Le QT; Fu KK; Kaplan M; Terris DJ; Fee WE; Goffinet DR
Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1700-11. PubMed ID: 10547542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recommendations for the reporting of pleural mesothelioma.
Butnor KJ; Sporn TA; Ordonez NG;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1587-9. PubMed ID: 17276491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymph node analysis in esophageal resection: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial.
Veeramachaneni NK; Zoole JB; Decker PA; Putnam JB; Meyers BF;
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 86(2):418-21; discussion 421. PubMed ID: 18640307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.
Greenstein AJ; Litle VR; Swanson SJ; Divino CM; Packer S; Wisnivesky JP
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1239-46. PubMed ID: 18224663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Srigley J; Grignon D; Humphrey P;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Sep; 38(9):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17707261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with esophageal carcinoma. A basis for checklists. The Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists, and the Task Force on the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Esophageal Cancer.
Lee RG; Compton CC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Sep; 121(9):925-9. PubMed ID: 9302923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. TNM staging of colorectal carcinoma: issues and caveats.
Shia J; Klimstra DS; Bagci P; Basturk O; Adsay NV
Semin Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 29(3):142-53. PubMed ID: 23062421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recommendations for the reporting of surgically resected specimens of colorectal carcinoma.
Jass JR; O'Brien MJ; Riddell RH; Snover DC;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Apr; 38(4):537-545. PubMed ID: 17270246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the accuracy of TNM staging in esophageal cancer: a pathological review of resected specimens.
Thompson SK; Ruszkiewicz AR; Jamieson GG; Esterman A; Watson DI; Wijnhoven BP; Lamb PJ; Devitt PG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):3447-58. PubMed ID: 18830669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
