These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9431313)

  • 1. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with colorectal carcinoma. A basis for checklists.
    Compton CC; Henson DE; Hutter RV; Sobin LH; Bowman HE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1247-54. PubMed ID: 9431313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with gastric carcinoma: a basis for checklists. Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists, and the Task Force for Protocols on the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Gastric Cancer.
    Compton C; Sobin LH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jan; 122(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 9448011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a basis for checklists. Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists.
    Compton CC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jul; 121(7):673-7. PubMed ID: 9240900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with colorectal carcinoma. A basis for checklists. Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists. Task Force for Protocols on the Examination of Specimens from Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
    Henson DE; Hutter RV; Sobin LH; Bowman HE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Feb; 118(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 8311648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a new classification system for curatively resected colorectal adenocarcinoma.
    Sternberg A; Sibirsky O; Cohen D; Blumenson LE; Petrelli NJ
    Cancer; 1999 Sep; 86(5):782-92. PubMed ID: 10463976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined.
    Cianchi F; Palomba A; Boddi V; Messerini L; Pucciani F; Perigli G; Bechi P; Cortesini C
    World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 11865379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.
    Jha MK; Corbett WA; Wilson RG; Koreli A; Papagrigoriadis S
    Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 17159746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist.
    Mohanty SK; Piccoli AL; Devine LJ; Patel AA; William GC; Winters SB; Becich MJ; Parwani AV
    BMC Cancer; 2007 Jul; 7():144. PubMed ID: 17672904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metastatic lymph node size and colorectal cancer prognosis.
    Dhar DK; Yoshimura H; Kinukawa N; Maruyama R; Tachibana M; Kohno H; Kubota H; Nagasue N
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jan; 200(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 15631916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential expression of alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase in colorectal carcinoma bears clinical and pathologic significance.
    Lin A; Weiser MR; Klimstra DS; Paty PB; Tang LH; Al-Ahmadie H; Hoo Park S; Guillem JG; Temple L; Wong WD; Gerald WL; Shia J
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Jun; 38(6):850-6. PubMed ID: 17442371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How many lymph nodes should be examined in Dukes' B colorectal cancer? Determination on the basis of cumulative survival rate.
    Yoshimatsu K; Ishibashi K; Umehara A; Yokomizo H; Yoshida K; Fujimoto T; Watanabe K; Ogawa K
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(66):1703-6. PubMed ID: 16334761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.
    Le QT; Fu KK; Kaplan M; Terris DJ; Fee WE; Goffinet DR
    Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1700-11. PubMed ID: 10547542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for the reporting of pleural mesothelioma.
    Butnor KJ; Sporn TA; Ordonez NG;
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1587-9. PubMed ID: 17276491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lymph node analysis in esophageal resection: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial.
    Veeramachaneni NK; Zoole JB; Decker PA; Putnam JB; Meyers BF;
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 86(2):418-21; discussion 421. PubMed ID: 18640307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.
    Greenstein AJ; Litle VR; Swanson SJ; Divino CM; Packer S; Wisnivesky JP
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1239-46. PubMed ID: 18224663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Srigley J; Grignon D; Humphrey P;
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Sep; 38(9):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17707261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with esophageal carcinoma. A basis for checklists. The Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists, and the Task Force on the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Esophageal Cancer.
    Lee RG; Compton CC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Sep; 121(9):925-9. PubMed ID: 9302923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TNM staging of colorectal carcinoma: issues and caveats.
    Shia J; Klimstra DS; Bagci P; Basturk O; Adsay NV
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 29(3):142-53. PubMed ID: 23062421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommendations for the reporting of surgically resected specimens of colorectal carcinoma.
    Jass JR; O'Brien MJ; Riddell RH; Snover DC;
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Apr; 38(4):537-545. PubMed ID: 17270246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the accuracy of TNM staging in esophageal cancer: a pathological review of resected specimens.
    Thompson SK; Ruszkiewicz AR; Jamieson GG; Esterman A; Watson DI; Wijnhoven BP; Lamb PJ; Devitt PG
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):3447-58. PubMed ID: 18830669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.