326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9431469)
1. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use.
Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of orthognathic surgery on speech and breathing of subjects with cleft lip and palate: acoustic and aerodynamic assessment.
Trindade IE; Yamashita RP; Suguimoto RM; Mazzottini R; Trindade AS
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12498606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between temporal aspects of oral-nasal balance and classification of velopharyngeal status in speakers with cleft palate.
Jones DL
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 10912715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cleft type and speech proficiency.
Haapanen ML
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1994; 46(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 8173613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.
Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; van Wijngaarden HA; Dejonckere PH
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12019003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual evaluation of speech and velopharyngeal function in children with and without cleft palate and the relationship to nasal airflow patterns.
Dotevall H; Lohmander-Agerskov A; Ejnell H; Bake B
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Jul; 39(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 12071789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Nasometer and listener judgments of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery.
Nellis JL; Neiman GS; Lehman JA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 1571349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of cleft type on overall speech intelligibility and resonance.
Van Lierde KM; De Bodt M; Van Borsel J; Wuyts FL; Van Cauwenberge P
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):158-68. PubMed ID: 12077507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of treatment concept, velopharyngoplasty, gender and age on hypernasality in patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate.
Joos U; Wermker K; Kruse-Löesler B; Kleinheinz J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 34(8):472-7. PubMed ID: 17157520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting speech in patients with isolated cleft palate. A methodic, clinical and instrumental study.
Haapanen ML
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg Suppl; 1992; 26():1-61. PubMed ID: 1486205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality.
Hardin MA; Van Demark DR; Morris HL; Payne MM
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jul; 29(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 1643065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow.
Karnell MP
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Mar; 32(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 7748876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults.
Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 11294538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.
Bressmann T
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 16001925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nasalance distance and ratio: two new measures.
Bressmann T; Sader R; Whitehill TL; Awan SN; Zeilhofer HF; Horch HH
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 May; 37(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 10830803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Articulation and nasality changes resulting from sustained palatal fistula obturation.
Pinborough-Zimmerman J; Canady C; Yamashiro DK; Morales L
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jan; 35(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 9482228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment.
Dalston RM; Warren DW; Dalston ET
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Apr; 28(2):184-8; discussion 188-9. PubMed ID: 2069975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children.
Watterson T; Hinton J; McFarlane S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jan; 33(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8849861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship of perceptual evaluation for resonance disorders to nasalance scores in children with cleft palate.
Prathanee B; Pumnum T; Seepuaham C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Nov; 95 Suppl 11():S100-5. PubMed ID: 23961628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
