These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9431469)

  • 1. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use.
    Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of orthognathic surgery on speech and breathing of subjects with cleft lip and palate: acoustic and aerodynamic assessment.
    Trindade IE; Yamashita RP; Suguimoto RM; Mazzottini R; Trindade AS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12498606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between temporal aspects of oral-nasal balance and classification of velopharyngeal status in speakers with cleft palate.
    Jones DL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 10912715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cleft type and speech proficiency.
    Haapanen ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1994; 46(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 8173613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; van Wijngaarden HA; Dejonckere PH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12019003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual evaluation of speech and velopharyngeal function in children with and without cleft palate and the relationship to nasal airflow patterns.
    Dotevall H; Lohmander-Agerskov A; Ejnell H; Bake B
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Jul; 39(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 12071789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Nasometer and listener judgments of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery.
    Nellis JL; Neiman GS; Lehman JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 1571349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cleft type on overall speech intelligibility and resonance.
    Van Lierde KM; De Bodt M; Van Borsel J; Wuyts FL; Van Cauwenberge P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):158-68. PubMed ID: 12077507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of treatment concept, velopharyngoplasty, gender and age on hypernasality in patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate.
    Joos U; Wermker K; Kruse-Löesler B; Kleinheinz J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 34(8):472-7. PubMed ID: 17157520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting speech in patients with isolated cleft palate. A methodic, clinical and instrumental study.
    Haapanen ML
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg Suppl; 1992; 26():1-61. PubMed ID: 1486205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality.
    Hardin MA; Van Demark DR; Morris HL; Payne MM
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jul; 29(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 1643065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow.
    Karnell MP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Mar; 32(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 7748876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults.
    Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 11294538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.
    Bressmann T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 16001925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nasalance distance and ratio: two new measures.
    Bressmann T; Sader R; Whitehill TL; Awan SN; Zeilhofer HF; Horch HH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 May; 37(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 10830803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Articulation and nasality changes resulting from sustained palatal fistula obturation.
    Pinborough-Zimmerman J; Canady C; Yamashiro DK; Morales L
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jan; 35(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 9482228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment.
    Dalston RM; Warren DW; Dalston ET
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Apr; 28(2):184-8; discussion 188-9. PubMed ID: 2069975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children.
    Watterson T; Hinton J; McFarlane S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jan; 33(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8849861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship of perceptual evaluation for resonance disorders to nasalance scores in children with cleft palate.
    Prathanee B; Pumnum T; Seepuaham C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Nov; 95 Suppl 11():S100-5. PubMed ID: 23961628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.