323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9431630)
1. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer.
Jönsson B; Annertz M; Sjöberg C; Strömqvist B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2938-44. PubMed ID: 9431630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical features related to radiographic findings.
Jönsson B; Annertz M; Sjöberg C; Strömqvist B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2932-7. PubMed ID: 9431629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.
Atlas SJ; Keller RB; Wu YA; Deyo RA; Singer DE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):936-43. PubMed ID: 15834339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study.
Gunzburg R; Keller TS; Szpalski M; Vandeputte K; Spratt KF
Eur Spine J; 2003 Apr; 12(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 12709858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Katz JN; Lipson SJ; Chang LC; Levine SA; Fossel AH; Liang MH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jan; 21(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 9122770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
Sinikallio S; Aalto T; Airaksinen O; Herno A; Kröger H; Viinamäki H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Negative impact of spinal epidural lipomatosis on the surgical outcome of posterior lumbar spinous-splitting decompression surgery: a multicenter retrospective study.
Fujita N; Ishihara S; Michikawa T; Suzuki S; Tsuji O; Nagoshi N; Okada E; Yagi M; Tsuji T; Kono H; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Watanabe K
Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1977-1985. PubMed ID: 31254650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Iguchi T; Kurihara A; Nakayama J; Sato K; Kurosaka M; Yamasaki K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(14):1754-9. PubMed ID: 10888941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Long-term results after undercutting decompression compared with decompressive laminectomy alone or with instrumented fusion.
Rompe JD; Eysel P; Zöllner J; Nafe B; Heine J
Neurosurg Rev; 1999 Oct; 22(2-3):102-6. PubMed ID: 10547007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Airaksinen O; Herno A; Turunen V; Saari T; Suomlainen O
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(19):2278-82. PubMed ID: 9346149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical results of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Herno A
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1995; 210():1-969. PubMed ID: 8546434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study.
Atlas SJ; Keller RB; Robson D; Deyo RA; Singer DE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Mar; 25(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 10749631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis.
Ferlic PW; Mannion AF; Jeszenszky D; Porchet F; Fekete TF; Kleinstück F; Haschtmann D
Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1333-1341. PubMed ID: 27363757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of walking ability after surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective study.
Takenaka H; Sugiura H; Kamiya M; Nishihama K; Ito A; Suzuki J; Kawamura M; Hanamura S; Hanamura H
Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1824-1831. PubMed ID: 31302266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Lumbar spinal stenosis. Symptomatology and methods of treatment].
Ivanov I; Milenković Z; Stefanović I; Babić M
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(11-12):450-6. PubMed ID: 9921018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
