175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9431928)
1. Comparison of performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent-antibody, ligase chain reaction, and PCR assays for verification of chlamydial enzyme immunoassay results for populations with a low to moderate prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Dean D; Ferrero D; McCarthy M
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jan; 36(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9431928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DFA, EIA, PCR, LCR and other technologies: what tests should be used for diagnosis of chlamydia infections?
Schachter J
Immunol Invest; 1997; 26(1-2):157-61. PubMed ID: 9037620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of the ligase chain reaction assay for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal swabs from women who are infected at other sites.
Thomas BJ; Pierpoint T; Taylor-Robinson D; Renton AM
Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Apr; 74(2):140-1. PubMed ID: 9634328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening women for chlamydia trachomatis in family planning clinics: the cost-effectiveness of DNA amplification assays.
Howell MR; Quinn TC; Brathwaite W; Gaydos CA
Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Feb; 25(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 9518379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of verification assays in EIA specimens presumptively positive for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Leonardi GP; Stavroulakis AM; Cruz J; Szabo K
J Med Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 44(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8642577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme combined with Chlamydia Blocking Reagent verification.
Zeeberg B; Thelin I; Schalén C
Int J STD AIDS; 1992; 3(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 1391063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vulval swabs as alternative specimens for ligase chain reaction detection of genital chlamydial infection in women.
Stary A; Najim B; Lee HH
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Apr; 35(4):836-8. PubMed ID: 9157137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of ligase chain reaction to polymerase chain reaction in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections.
Davis JD; Riley PK; Peters CW; Rand KH
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 9702586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal specimens from female commercial sex workers using a new improved enzyme immunoassay.
Tanaka M; Nakayama H; Yoshida H; Takahashi K; Nagafuji T; Hagiwara T; Kumazawa J
Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Dec; 74(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 10195054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urine specimens from women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic: implications for screening strategies.
Thomas BJ; Pierpoint T; Taylor-Robinson D; Renton AM
Int J STD AIDS; 1998 Aug; 9(8):448-51. PubMed ID: 9702592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of urine-based screening strategies to detect Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active asymptomatic young males.
Shafer MA; Schachter J; Moncada J; Keogh J; Pantell R; Gourlay L; Eyre S; Boyer CB
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(17):2065-70. PubMed ID: 8411573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Horsman GB
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests.
Van Dyck E; Ieven M; Pattyn S; Van Damme L; Laga M
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1751-6. PubMed ID: 11325985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF
Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR in genitourinary specimens from men and women attending an STD clinic.
Bhalla P; Baveja UK; Chawla R; Saini S; Khaki P; Bhalla K; Mahajan S; Reddy BS
J Commun Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18338709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infected women.
Chernesky MA; Jang D; Sellors J; Luinstra K; Chong S; Castriciano S; Mahony JB
Mol Cell Probes; 1997 Aug; 11(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 9281409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test.
Beebe JL; Masters H; Jungkind D; Heltzel DM; Weinberg A
Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8946630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction and enzyme immunoassay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in different female genitourinary specimens.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Stoneham H; Antonishyn N; Horsman GB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Jun; 124(6):840-3. PubMed ID: 10835517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
