175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9431928)
21. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.
Lefebvre J; Laperrière H; Rousseau H; Massé R
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by urine tests among adolescents clinics.
Beck-Sague CM; Farshy CE; Jackson TK; Guillory L; Edelkind D; Bullard JC; Urdez EA; Jones B; Francis K; Sievert A; Morse SA; Black CM
J Adolesc Health; 1998 Mar; 22(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 9502006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. First-void urine testing for Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction in asymptomatic women.
Paukku M; Puolakkainen M; Apter D; Hirvonen S; Paavonen J
Sex Transm Dis; 1997 Jul; 24(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 9243741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection methods in a low-prevalence population in a primary care setting.
Gann PH; Herrmann JE; Candib L; Hudson RW
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1580-5. PubMed ID: 2199520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
Chan SW
Pathology; 1993 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 8316503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing.
Fonseca K; Megran DW; Anand CM
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 7730479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA assay with specimens from women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
Pate MS; Dixon PB; Hardy K; Crosby M; Hook EW
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):2183-6. PubMed ID: 9665987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Magder LS; Klontz KC; Bush LH; Barnes RC
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Apr; 28(4):781-4. PubMed ID: 2185264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Qualitative and quantitative aspects of the ligase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract samples and urines.
Thomas BJ; Pierpoint T; Taylor-Robinson D; Renton AM
Int J STD AIDS; 2001 Sep; 12(9):589-94. PubMed ID: 11516368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Low correlation of serology with detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction and antigen EIA.
Rabenau HF; Köhler E; Peters M; Doerr HW; Weber B
Infection; 2000; 28(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 10782395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evidence of labile inhibitors in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction.
Clad A; Naudascher I; Flecken U; Freidank HM; Petersen EE
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Sep; 15(9):744-7. PubMed ID: 8922576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.
Schachter J; Stamm WE; Quinn TC; Andrews WW; Burczak JD; Lee HH
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Oct; 32(10):2540-3. PubMed ID: 7814494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genital chlamydial infection among women in Nicaragua: validity of direct fluorescent antibody testing, prevalence, risk factors and clinical manifestations.
Herrmann B; Espinoza F; Villegas RR; Smith GD; Ramos A; Egger M
Genitourin Med; 1996 Feb; 72(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 8655162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and suggestions for improving sensitivity.
Thomas BJ; MacLeod EJ; Taylor-Robinson D
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1995 Aug; 14(8):719-23. PubMed ID: 8565995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of sequential enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescent antibody tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.
Schwebke JR; Stamm WE; Handsfield HH
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Nov; 28(11):2473-6. PubMed ID: 2254422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of an automated enzyme immunoassay with a direct fluorescent antibody test and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in diagnostic specimens from male patients.
Tong CY; Valentine C; Arya OP
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Apr; 15(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 8781887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Diagnosis of chlamydial infections--personal experience].
Mahmutović S; Beslagić E; Seremet M; Cavaljuga S
Med Arh; 2003; 57(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 12858650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of polymerase chain reaction on pooled cervical swabs to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female sex workers in Singapore.
Tan HH; Chan R
Singapore Med J; 2005 May; 46(5):215-8. PubMed ID: 15858689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lowering the cut off value of an automated chlamydia enzyme immunoassay and confirmation by PCR and direct immunofluorescent antibody test.
Tong CY; Donnelly C; Hood N
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Aug; 50(8):681-5. PubMed ID: 9301554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and aspects of the laboratory diagnostics.
Svensson LO; Mares I; Olsson SE; Nordström ML
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(7-8):587-90. PubMed ID: 1785275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
