These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9431928)

  • 41. Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.
    Newhall WJ; Johnson RE; DeLisle S; Fine D; Hadgu A; Matsuda B; Osmond D; Campbell J; Stamm WE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):681-5. PubMed ID: 9986831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of three new nonculture tests in the diagnosis of Chlamydia genital infections.
    Schubiner HH; Lebar W; Jemal C; Hershman B
    J Adolesc Health Care; 1990 Nov; 11(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 2124578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Diagnostic efficacy of a real time-PCR assay for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in infertile women in north India.
    Dhawan B; Rawre J; Ghosh A; Malhotra N; Ahmed MM; Sreenivas V; Chaudhry R
    Indian J Med Res; 2014 Aug; 140(2):252-61. PubMed ID: 25297359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Use of ligase chain reaction for laboratory identification of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in adolescent women.
    Braverman PK; Schwarz DF; Mph M; Deforest A; Hodinka RL; McGowan KL; Mortensen JE
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11888808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending a gynecology outpatient department in India.
    Singh V; Rastogi S; Garg S; Kapur S; Kumar A; Salhan S; Mittal A
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(3):540-4. PubMed ID: 12040650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits.
    Stary A; Tomazic-Allen S; Choueiri B; Burczak J; Steyrer K; Lee H
    Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 8919734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An algorithm to detect Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction on specimens extracted for enzyme immunoassay.
    Chui L; Kakulphimp J; Detwiler B; Prasad E
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Nov; 32(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 9884834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
    Brokenshire MK; Say PJ; van Vonno AH; Wong C
    Genitourin Med; 1997 Dec; 73(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 9582469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of the Abbott LCx ligase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine and genital swab specimens from a sexually transmitted disease clinic population.
    Carroll KC; Aldeen WE; Morrison M; Anderson R; Lee D; Mottice S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1630-3. PubMed ID: 9620391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Screening urine with a leukocyte esterase strip and subsequent chlamydial testing of asymptomatic men attending primary care practitioners.
    Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Pickard L; Jang D; Groves D; Luinstra KE; Chernesky MA
    Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 8511709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Diagnostic utility of PCR-enzyme immunoassay, culture, and serology for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Gaydos CA; Roblin PM; Hammerschlag MR; Hyman CL; Eiden JJ; Schachter J; Quinn TC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Apr; 32(4):903-5. PubMed ID: 8027341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending urban midwestern family planning and community health clinics: risk factors, selective screening, and evaluation of non-culture techniques.
    Addiss DG; Vaughn ML; Golubjatnikov R; Pfister J; Kurtycz DF; Davis JP
    Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 2247804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by ligase chain reaction versus ACCESS Chlamydia antigen assay.
    Waites KB; Smith KR; Crum MA; Hockett RD; Wells AH; Hook EW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Sep; 37(9):3072-3. PubMed ID: 10449512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of enzyme immunoassay for the rapid diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infection in female adolescents.
    Krowchuk DP; Anglin TM; Lembo RM; Brown RF; Thomas F; Kumar ML
    J Adolesc Health Care; 1988 Jul; 9(4):296-300. PubMed ID: 3047093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use of ligase chain reaction with urine versus cervical culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an asymptomatic military population of pregnant and nonpregnant females attending Papanicolaou smear clinics.
    Gaydos CA; Howell MR; Quinn TC; Gaydos JC; McKee KT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1300-4. PubMed ID: 9574695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Urine as a diagnostic specimen for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Malaysia by ligase chain reaction.
    Gaydos CA; Ngeow YF; Lee HH; Canavaggio M; Welsh LE; Johanson J; Quinn TC
    Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(5):402-6. PubMed ID: 8885072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.
    Chernesky M; Jang D; Sellors J; Castriciano S; Pickard L; Luinstra K; Mahony J
    Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Optimised sample DNA preparation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in synovial tissue by polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction.
    Freise J; Gérard HC; Bunke T; Whittum-Hudson JA; Zeidler H; Köhler L; Hudson AP; Kuipers JG
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Feb; 60(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 11156547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Puolakkainen M; Hiltunen-Back E; Reunala T; Suhonen S; Lähteenmäki P; Lehtinen M; Paavonen J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1489-93. PubMed ID: 9620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Screening for genital chlamydia infection: DNA amplification techniques should be the test of choice.
    Harindra V; Underhill G; Tobin JM
    Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Nov; 14(11):723-6. PubMed ID: 14624732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.