263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9433436)
1. Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Pogue J; Yusuf S
Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9095):47-52. PubMed ID: 9433436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses.
Brok J; Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Gluud C
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):287-98. PubMed ID: 18824466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
Moher D; Pham B; Jones A; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Moher M; Tugwell P; Klassen TP
Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):609-13. PubMed ID: 9746022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials in oncology.
Pignon JP; Hill C
Lancet Oncol; 2001 Aug; 2(8):475-82. PubMed ID: 11905723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.
Donner A; Klar N
Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.
Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 18083463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individual patient data meta-analysis of trials of self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes: protocol for a systematic review.
Farmer AJ; Heneghan C; Barnett AH; Davidson MB; Guerci B; O'Kane M; Schwedes U; Perera R;
Prim Care Diabetes; 2009 May; 3(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 19375398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Summarising the Evidence for Drug Safety: A Methodological Discussion of Different Meta-Analysis Approaches.
Prada-Ramallal G; Takkouche B; Figueiras A
Drug Saf; 2017 Jul; 40(7):547-558. PubMed ID: 28299611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Meta-analyses on individual patient data and treatment evaluation in oncology].
Pignon JP; Aupérin A; Hill C
Bull Cancer; 2007 Nov; 94(11):957-64. PubMed ID: 18055313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of the Cochrane Collaboration: the point of view of meta-analysis practitioner].
Pignon JP
Therapie; 1996; 51(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 8881118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
