BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9433622)

  • 1. The role of smoothing techniques in the interpretation of results from genomic scans using sib-pair data.
    Siegmund KD; Todorov AA; Rao DC; Borecki IB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1047-52. PubMed ID: 9433622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical evaluation of genome scans for linkage of a quantitative trait associated with a complex disorder.
    Xu J; Panhuysen C; Taylor E; Wiesch D; Meyers D
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):927-32. PubMed ID: 9433602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequential sib-pair and association studies to detect genes in quantitative traits.
    Savage A; Sun F; Crawford DC; Ashley AE; Yang Q; Sherman SL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):885-90. PubMed ID: 9433595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome screening using extremely discordant and extremely concordant sib pairs.
    Gu C; Todorov AA; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 9433579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of evidence for linkage from different analytic methods.
    Bull SB; Pinnaduwage D; Shin J; Xie F; Tritchler D
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):965-70. PubMed ID: 9433608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A graphical approach for presenting linkage results from a genomic screen.
    Pugh EW; Mandal DM; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):807-12. PubMed ID: 8788013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False discoveries in genome scanning.
    Drigalenko EI; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 9433577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The method of sib-pair linkage analysis in context of case-control design.
    Yang Q; Atkinson M; Sun F; Sherman S; Khoury MJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):939-44. PubMed ID: 9433604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sib-pair linkage analyses of nuclear family data: quantitative versus dichotomous disease classification.
    Korczak JF; Goldstein AM
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 9433585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comprehensive analysis of complex traits in problem 2A.
    Juo SH; Beaty TH; Duffy DL; Maestri NE; Prenger VL; Zeiger J; Lei HH; Coresh J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 9433583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of MIM in comparison with MAPMAKER/SIBS to detect QTLs.
    Shugart YY; Goldgar DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 9433597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improvement of the power to detect complex disease genes by regional inference procedures.
    Goldin LR; Chase GA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):785-9. PubMed ID: 9433578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of major genes underlying several quantitative traits associated with a common disease using different ascertainment schemes.
    Iyengar S; Calafell F; Kidd KK
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 9433582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of sib-pair and variance-components methods for genomic screening.
    Pugh EW; Jaquish CE; Sorant AJ; Doetsch JP; Bailey-Wilson JE; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):867-72. PubMed ID: 9433592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistically robust approaches for sib-pair linkage analysis.
    Wang J; Guerra R; Cohen J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Jul; 62(Pt 4):349-59. PubMed ID: 9924612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of marker information on sib-pair linkage analysis of a rare disease.
    Korczak JF; Pugh EW; Premkumar S; Guo X; Elston RC; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 8787984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonparametric trend statistic incorporating dispersion differences in sib pair linkage for quantitative traits.
    Kim MK; Hong YJ; Song HH
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16954696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.