These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9433626)

  • 1. Empirical affected-sib-pair statistics: two simulation strategies.
    Dina C; Buzzi JC; Demenais F; Martinez M
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1073-8. PubMed ID: 9433626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
    Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unbiased discordant sib-pair tests when parental genotypes are missing.
    Rabinowitz D
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Jan; 105(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11425000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotype relative-risks and association tests for nuclear families with missing parental data.
    Schaid DJ; Li H
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 9433633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of smoothing techniques in the interpretation of results from genomic scans using sib-pair data.
    Siegmund KD; Todorov AA; Rao DC; Borecki IB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1047-52. PubMed ID: 9433622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilities of identity-by-descent patterns in sibships when the parents are not genotyped.
    Todorov AA; Siegmund KD; Gu C; Borecki IB; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):909-13. PubMed ID: 9433599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical validity of the Haseman-Elston sib-pair test in small samples.
    Wilson AF; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 8314066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family-based association tests in genome screens.
    Chung RH; Hauser ER; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 17123303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis as a covariate in sib-pair linkage analysis.
    Rice JP
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Jan; 105(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 11424999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: sib pair screening tests for linkage.
    Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 14968835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases.
    Göring HH; Ott J
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 9195155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transmission disequilibrium test with discordant sib pairs when parents are available.
    Deng HW; Chen WM; Recker RR
    Hum Genet; 2002 May; 110(5):451-61. PubMed ID: 12073016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multivariate approach to affected-sib-pair analysis using highly dense molecular maps.
    Bailey JN; Palmer CG; Woodward JA; Smalley SL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):761-6. PubMed ID: 9433574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for identifying genes related to a quantitative trait, incorporating multiple siblings and missing parents.
    Kistner EO; Weinberg CR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 29(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 16025442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Aug; 9(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 11528507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.