BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9433633)

  • 21. The TDT reveals linkage and linkage disequilibrium in a rare disease.
    McGinnis RE; Ewens WJ; Spielman RS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):637-40. PubMed ID: 8787986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using information from both parents when testing for association between marker and disease loci.
    Whittaker JC; Morris AP; Curnow RN
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 9554556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimating haplotype relative risks in complex disease from unphased SNPs data in families using a likelihood adjusted for ascertainment.
    Carayol J; Philippi A; Tores F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):666-76. PubMed ID: 16917928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relative-risk regression models using cases and their parents.
    Schaid DJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):813-8. PubMed ID: 8788014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A general class of association tests for family-based data using weight functions.
    Liu X; Gordon D
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 24(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 12652525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Application of 'Family-Based Association Test' in studying genetic epidemiology].
    Pei LJ; Li CF; Zhang L; Song XM; Zheng XY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1255-9. PubMed ID: 19173976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Power comparison of regression methods to test quantitative traits for association and linkage.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 10797592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. HLA and susceptibility to juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a study of affected sibpairs in an isolated Finnish population.
    Säilä H; Pitkäniemi J; Tuomilehto J; Savolainen A; Alakulppi N; Tuomilehto-Wolf E; Leirisalo-Repo M; Aho K
    J Rheumatol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2281-5. PubMed ID: 15517645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Covariate effects on linkage and association using a general pair method.
    Ward PJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1059-64. PubMed ID: 9433624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Power calculations for a general class of tests of linkage and association that use nuclear families with affected and unaffected sibs.
    Kaplan NL; Martin ER
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 11855953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Empirical affected-sib-pair statistics: two simulation strategies.
    Dina C; Buzzi JC; Demenais F; Martinez M
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1073-8. PubMed ID: 9433626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 11119297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the advantage of haplotype analysis in the presence of multiple disease susceptibility alleles.
    Morris RW; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Oct; 23(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 12384975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
    Morris RW; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
    McGinnis RE
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. AGFAP method: applicability under different ascertainment schemes and a parental contributions test.
    Thomson G
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(5):289-310. PubMed ID: 8224808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
    Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family-based association tests in genome screens.
    Chung RH; Hauser ER; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 17123303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.