These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9433660)
1. Coordinating activities between NOAA and other agencies. Fritz AT; Buchman MF Drug Chem Toxicol; 1997 Nov; 20(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9433660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective coordination and cooperation between ecological risk assessments and natural resource damage assessments: a new synthesis. Gouguet RG; Charters DW; Champagne LF; Davis M; Desvouges W; Durda JL; Hyatt WH; Jacobson R; Kapustka L; Longoria RM Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 19545190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Nexus between ecological risk assessment and natural resource damage assessment under CERCLA: introduction to a Society of Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryTechnical Workshop. Stahl RG; Gouguet R; Charters D; Clements W; Gala W; Haddad R; Helm R; Landis W; Maki A; Munns WR; Young D Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):496-9. PubMed ID: 19545185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy. Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulatory requirements and tools for environmental assessment of hazardous wastes: understanding tribal and stakeholder concerns using Department of Energy sites. Burger J; Powers C; Gochfeld M J Environ Manage; 2010 Dec; 91(12):2707-16. PubMed ID: 20719428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. If coordination of remediation and restoration under CERCLA is such a good idea, why is it not practiced more widely? Stahl RG; Martin J; Tomasi T; Goldsmith BJ J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 340():117964. PubMed ID: 37137209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overview of DOD activities in ecological risk assessment. Whaley JE; Porter RC Drug Chem Toxicol; 1997 Nov; 20(4):303-5. PubMed ID: 9433659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying natural resource injuries and ecological service reductions: challenges and opportunities. Barnthouse LW; Stahl RG Environ Manage; 2002 Jul; 30(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 12053235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site. Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):478. PubMed ID: 30030638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Federal environmental and occupational toxicology regulations and reporting requirements: a practical approach to what the medical toxicologist needs to know, part 1. Schwartz MD; Dell'Aglio DM; Nickle R; Hornsby-Myers J J Med Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 10(3):319-30. PubMed ID: 25023223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ecological risk assessment and natural resource damage assessment: synthesis of assessment procedures. Gala W; Lipton J; Cernera P; Ginn T; Haddad R; Henning M; Jahn K; Landis W; Mancini E; Nicoll J; Peters V; Peterson J Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):515-22. PubMed ID: 19545186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A framework for increasing sustainability and reducing risk to ecological resources through integration of remediation planning and implementation. Burger J Environ Res; 2019 May; 172():586-595. PubMed ID: 30875512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural resource damage assessments in the United States: rules and procedures for compensation from spills of hazardous substances and oil in waterways under US jurisdiction. Ofiara DD Mar Pollut Bull; 2002 Feb; 44(2):96-110. PubMed ID: 11981983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for net environmental benefit analysis for remediation or restoration of contaminated sites. Efroymson RA; Nicolette JP; Suter GW Environ Manage; 2004 Sep; 34(3):315-31. PubMed ID: 15520889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents? Ingram RJ Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):208-213. PubMed ID: 30086017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The CEECHE: a practical approach for reducing exposures and disease outcomes in Central and Eastern Europe. Suk WA Rev Environ Health; 2017 Mar; 32(1-2):3-8. PubMed ID: 27837599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Science, policy, and stakeholders: developing a consensus science plan for Amchitka Island, Aleutians, Alaska. Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Powers CW; Friedlander B; Eichelberger J; Barnes D; Duffy LK; Jewett SC; Volz CD Environ Manage; 2005 May; 35(5):557-68. PubMed ID: 15886955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A paradigm for protecting ecological resources following remediation as a function of future land use designations: a case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site. Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury J; Jeitner C Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Feb; 192(3):181. PubMed ID: 32065319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy. Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]