435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9434965)
1. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
Zhao W; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector.
Zhao W; Blevis I; Germann S; Rowlands JA; Waechter D; Huang Z
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1834-43. PubMed ID: 9434966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital x-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: reduction of aliasing.
Ji WG; Zhao W; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2148-62. PubMed ID: 9829239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 30488455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MTF and DQE enhancement using an apodized-aperture x-ray detector design.
Nano TF; Escartin T; Ismailova E; Karim KS; Lindström J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4525-4535. PubMed ID: 28636792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise.
Hajdok G; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3194-204. PubMed ID: 18697544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amorphous selenium flat panel detectors for digital mammography: validation of a NPWE model observer with CDMAM observer performance experiments.
Segui JA; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3711-22. PubMed ID: 17089837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detective quantum efficiency of a direct-detection active matrix flat panel imager at megavoltage energies.
Lachaine M; Fourkal E; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1364-72. PubMed ID: 11488567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.
Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 9608470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography.
Monnin P; Bosmans H; Verdun FR; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(5):2083-108. PubMed ID: 26895467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of characteristic x rays on the noise power spectra and detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive x-ray detectors.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2039-49. PubMed ID: 11695766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Golinelli P; Acchiappati D; Gallo E
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detective quantum efficiency of an amorphous selenium detector to megavoltage radiation.
Mah D; Rawlinson JA; Rowlands JA
Phys Med Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 10368025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. X-ray imaging using avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium: investigation of depth dependent avalanche noise.
Hunt DC; Tanioka K; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):976-86. PubMed ID: 17441244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
