These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9434965)

  • 1. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
    Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector.
    Zhao W; Blevis I; Germann S; Rowlands JA; Waechter D; Huang Z
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1834-43. PubMed ID: 9434966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital x-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: reduction of aliasing.
    Ji WG; Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2148-62. PubMed ID: 9829239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
    Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 30488455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MTF and DQE enhancement using an apodized-aperture x-ray detector design.
    Nano TF; Escartin T; Ismailova E; Karim KS; Lindström J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4525-4535. PubMed ID: 28636792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise.
    Hajdok G; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3194-204. PubMed ID: 18697544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amorphous selenium flat panel detectors for digital mammography: validation of a NPWE model observer with CDMAM observer performance experiments.
    Segui JA; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3711-22. PubMed ID: 17089837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detective quantum efficiency of a direct-detection active matrix flat panel imager at megavoltage energies.
    Lachaine M; Fourkal E; Fallone BG
    Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1364-72. PubMed ID: 11488567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 9608470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography.
    Monnin P; Bosmans H; Verdun FR; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(5):2083-108. PubMed ID: 26895467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of characteristic x rays on the noise power spectra and detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive x-ray detectors.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2039-49. PubMed ID: 11695766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography.
    Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Golinelli P; Acchiappati D; Gallo E
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detective quantum efficiency of an amorphous selenium detector to megavoltage radiation.
    Mah D; Rawlinson JA; Rowlands JA
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 10368025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
    Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. X-ray imaging using avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium: investigation of depth dependent avalanche noise.
    Hunt DC; Tanioka K; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):976-86. PubMed ID: 17441244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.