173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9435753)
1. Principles and mechanisms. A response to the career scientist award controversy.
Pincus HA
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1998 Jan; 55(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9435753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. On preserving the National Institute of Mental Health Career Scientist Award.
Holzman PS; Kupfer DJ; Andreasen NC
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1998 Jan; 55(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 9435751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The National Institute of Mental Health Career Scientist Awards.
Baldessarini RJ
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1998 Jan; 55(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 9435754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The K-05 award controversy.
Hyman SE
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1998 Jan; 55(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 9435755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Not-so-special K's. Let's limit K-05 awards.
Nestler EJ
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1998 Jan; 55(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 9435752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The future of career development awards: how will it influence mental health research?
Erickson SK; Erickson ML
Am J Psychiatry; 2007 May; 164(5):827; author reply 827. PubMed ID: 17475745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Budget woes, sequester place researchers in a bind: young researchers hard hit.
Kuehn BM
JAMA; 2014 Jan; 311(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 24381954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. No more third time lucky.
Ledford H
Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7215):841. PubMed ID: 18923475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Windfall warning.
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The vascular surgeon-scientist: a 15-year report of the Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-mentored Career Development Award Program.
Kibbe MR; Dardik A; Velazquez OC; Conte MS;
J Vasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 61(4):1050-7. PubMed ID: 25814368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Academies seek better prospects for postdocs.
Ebert J
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):426. PubMed ID: 15791219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Challenges of NIH funding for young investigators: how the AGA is filling the gap via the AGA research foundation.
Wang TC; Souza RF
Gastroenterology; 2014 Jun; 146(7):1809-12. PubMed ID: 24983081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Caught in the middle?
Magavi SS
Science; 2008 Sep; 321(5897):1776. PubMed ID: 18818340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An unhealthy obsession.
Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):7. PubMed ID: 23236611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Grants: Funder storm.
Shen H
Nature; 2014 Apr; 508(7497):555-6. PubMed ID: 24822279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH abandons grant cap, offers new help to younger scientists.
Kaiser J
Science; 2017 Jun; 356(6343):1108. PubMed ID: 28619891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the stimulus working for you?
Freeman R; Block F; Greenberg D; Levi M; Segal AM; Crow M; Teitelbaum MS
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):876-8. PubMed ID: 19829353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
Berg JM
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Increasing R01 competition concerns researchers.
Vastag B
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Oct; 98(20):1436-8. PubMed ID: 17047187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cash boost for US science.
Tollefson J; Wadman M; Monastersky R
Nature; 2009 Jan; 457(7228):364-5. PubMed ID: 19158754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
