These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9436267)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of equine lymphocyte subsets in whole blood and gradient-purified samples.
    Akens MK; Holznagel E; Franchini M; Bracher V
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 1997 Sep; 58(3-4):231-7. PubMed ID: 9436267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lymphocyte immunophenotyping by flow cytometry in normal adults. Comparison of fresh whole blood lysis technique, Ficoll-Paque separation and cryopreservation.
    Romeu MA; Mestre M; González L; Valls A; Verdaguer J; Corominas M; Bas J; Massip E; Buendia E
    J Immunol Methods; 1992 Sep; 154(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 1401946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid single-step method for flow cytometric detection of surface and intracellular antigens using whole blood.
    Francis C; Connelly MC
    Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 8875055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immunophenotypical characterization in Andalusian horse: variations with age and gender.
    Satué K; Hernández A; Lorente C; O'Connor JE
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2010 Feb; 133(2-4):219-27. PubMed ID: 19735948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three monoclonal antibodies identifying antigens on all equine T lymphocytes, and two mutually exclusive T-lymphocyte subsets.
    Lunn DP; Holmes MA; Duffus WP
    Immunology; 1991 Oct; 74(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 1748472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of whole blood lysis methods for flow cytometry.
    Bossuyt X; Marti GE; Fleisher TA
    Cytometry; 1997 Jun; 30(3):124-33. PubMed ID: 9222098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A rapid technique for lymphocyte preparation prior to two-color immunofluorescence analysis of lymphocyte subsets using flow cytometry. Comparison with density gradient separation.
    Mansour I; Bourin P; Rouger P; Doinel C
    J Immunol Methods; 1990 Feb; 127(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 2181022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference ranges for lymphocyte subsets. A comparison of standard vs rapid whole-blood lysis techniques.
    Kotylo PK; Sample RB; Redmond NL; Hibner GC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Feb; 115(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 1992988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of four lymphocyte isolation methods applied to rodent T cell subpopulations and B cells.
    Pelegrí C; Rodríguez-Palmero M; Morante MP; Comas J; Castell M; Franch A
    J Immunol Methods; 1995 Dec; 187(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 7499886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Method validation and reference range values for a peripheral blood immunophenotyping assay in non-human primates.
    Caldwell RG; Marshall P; Fishel J
    J Immunotoxicol; 2016; 13(1):64-76. PubMed ID: 25600312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in expression of MHC class II antigens on horse lymphocytes determined by MHC haplotype.
    Barbis DP; Bainbridge D; Crump AL; Zhang CH; Antczak DF
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 1994 Jul; 42(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 7975179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epithelial lymphocyte and macrophage distribution in the adult and fetal equine lung.
    Banks EM; Kyriakidou M; Little S; Hamblin AS
    J Comp Pathol; 1999 Jan; 120(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10098012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Canine peripheral blood lymphocyte phenotyping by 7-color multiparameter flow cytometry.
    Platt R; Ng T; Glover S; Roof M; Kimura K; Roth JA
    Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol; 2013 Aug; 35(4):197-204. PubMed ID: 24341122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double-staining artefact observed in certain individuals during dual-colour immunophenotyping of lymphocytes by flow cytometry.
    Ekong T; Gompels M; Clark C; Parkin J; Pinching A
    Cytometry; 1993; 14(6):679-84. PubMed ID: 8404375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical influences on immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. The effect of time and temperature of storage on the viability of lymphocyte subsets.
    Ekong T; Kupek E; Hill A; Clark C; Davies A; Pinching A
    J Immunol Methods; 1993 Sep; 164(2):263-73. PubMed ID: 8370932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phenotypic characterization of lymphocyte subpopulations in horses affected with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and in normal controls.
    Watson JL; Stott JL; Blanchard MT; Lavoie JP; Wilson WD; Gershwin LJ; Wilson DW
    Vet Pathol; 1997 Mar; 34(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 9066077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enumeration of human lymphocyte subsets by monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry: a comparative study using whole blood or mononuclear cells separated by density gradient centrifugation.
    De Paoli P; Reitano M; Battistin S; Castiglia C; Santini G
    J Immunol Methods; 1984 Sep; 72(2):349-53. PubMed ID: 6332151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lymphocyte subset analysis by flow cytometry. Comparison of three different staining techniques and effects of blood storage.
    Ashmore LM; Shopp GM; Edwards BS
    J Immunol Methods; 1989 Mar; 118(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 2466904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whole blood method for simultaneous detection of surface and cytoplasmic antigens by flow cytometry.
    Landay A; Jennings C; Forman M; Raynor R
    Cytometry; 1993; 14(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 8513697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lymphocyte phenotype subsets in the cerebrospinal fluid of normal horses and horses with equine protozoal myeloencephalitis.
    Furr M; Pontzer C; Gasper P
    Vet Ther; 2001; 2(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 19746654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.