These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9437040)

  • 1. Accuracy and diagnostic sensitivity of radiographic absorptiometry of the second metacarpal.
    Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Takada M; Yang SO; Grampp S; Dhillon MS; Genant HK
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1998 Feb; 62(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 9437040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
    Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study.
    Boonen S; Nijs J; Borghs H; Peeters H; Vanderschueren D; Luyten FP
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Jan; 16(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 15197540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of osteoporosis: comparison of radiographic absorptiometry of the phalanges and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the radius and lumbar spine.
    Takada M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Grampp S; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):759-63. PubMed ID: 9051031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed radiographic absorptiometry and morphometry in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss.
    Adami S; Zamberlan N; Gatti D; Zanfisi C; Braga V; Broggini M; Rossini M
    Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 8845604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Grampp S; Lang P; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Mathur A; Engelke K; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR), and conventional radiographs in the evaluation of osteoporosis and bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Jensen T; Hansen M; Jensen KE; Pødenphant J; Hansen TM; Hyldstrup L
    Scand J Rheumatol; 2005; 34(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 15903022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical trial for differentiation between corticoid-induced osteoporosis and periarticular demineralization via digital radiogrammetry in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis].
    Böttcher J; Pfeil A; Lehmann G; Heinrich B; Malich A; Hansch A; Petrovitch A; Mentzel HJ; Hein G; Kaiser WA
    Z Rheumatol; 2004 Dec; 63(6):473-82. PubMed ID: 15605213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacarpal bone mass in normal and osteoporotic Japanese women using computed X-ray densitometry.
    Matsumoto C; Kushida K; Yamazaki K; Imose K; Inoue T
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Nov; 55(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 7866910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone density reduction in various measurement sites in men and women with osteoporotic fractures of spine and hip: the European quantitation of osteoporosis study.
    Kröger H; Lunt M; Reeve J; Dequeker J; Adams JE; Birkenhager JC; Diaz Curiel M; Felsenberg D; Hyldstrup L; Kotzki P; Laval-Jeantet A; Lips P; Louis O; Perez Cano R; Reiners C; Ribot C; Ruegsegger P; Schneider P; Braillon P; Pearson J
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1999 Mar; 64(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 10024374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision and accuracy of computed digital absorptiometry for assessment of bone density of the hand.
    Bouxsein ML; Michaeli DA; Plass DB; Schick DA; Melton ME
    Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 9425502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone loss in unclassified polyarthritis and early rheumatoid arthritis is better detected by digital x ray radiogrammetry than dual x ray absorptiometry: relationship with disease activity and radiographic outcome.
    Jensen T; Klarlund M; Hansen M; Jensen KE; Pødenphant J; Hansen TM; Skjødt H; Hyldstrup L;
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2004 Jan; 63(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 14672886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of bone mass by image analysis of metacarpal bone roentgenograms: a quantitative digital image processing (DIP) method.
    Hayashi Y; Yamamoto K; Fukunaga M; Ishibashi T; Takahashi K; Nishii Y
    Radiat Med; 1990; 8(5):173-8. PubMed ID: 2075234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indexes of bone mineral content on second metacarpal bone roentgenogram analyzed by digital image processing: a comparison with other bone mass quantifying methods.
    Fukunaga M; Tomomitsu T; Otsuka N; Imai H; Morita R; Nishii Y
    Radiat Med; 1990; 8(6):230-5. PubMed ID: 2093943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new trabecular region of interest for femoral dual X-ray absorptiometry: short-term precision, age-related bone loss, and fracture discrimination compared with current femoral regions of interest.
    Takada M; Grampp S; Ouyang X; Engelke K; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):832-8. PubMed ID: 9144350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
    Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of low bone mass and prediction of fracture risk using metacarpal radiogrammetry method: a comparative study with DXA and X-ray phantom.
    Ashok Kumar D; Anburajan M; Snekhalatha U
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2018 Jul; 21(7):1350-1371. PubMed ID: 29968333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertebral bone attenuation on low-dose chest CT: quantitative volumetric analysis for bone fragility assessment.
    Kim YW; Kim JH; Yoon SH; Lee JH; Lee CH; Shin CS; Park YS
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):329-338. PubMed ID: 27480628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A technical and clinical evaluation of digital X-ray radiogrammetry.
    Ward KA; Cotton J; Adams JE
    Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 12730766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.