BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9437562)

  • 1. Ultrasound characteristics of subdermally implanted Implanon contraceptive rods.
    Lantz A; Nosher JL; Pasquale S; Siegel RL
    Contraception; 1997 Nov; 56(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 9437562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized multicenter study comparing the efficacy and bleeding pattern of a single-rod (Implanon) and a six-capsule (Norplant) hormonal contraceptive implant.
    Zheng SR; Zheng HM; Qian SZ; Sang GW; Kaper RF
    Contraception; 1999 Jul; 60(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10549446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Sonographic localization of non-palpable implanon hormone implants].
    Prosch H; Walter RM; Westermayer V; Mostbeck GH
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Dec; 29 Suppl 5():239-44. PubMed ID: 19177287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound localisation and removal of non-palpable Implanon implants.
    James P; Trenery J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jun; 46(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 16704477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonography: usefulness in localization of the Norplant contraceptive implant system.
    Glauser SJ; Scharling ES; Stovall TG; Zagoria RJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 1995 Jun; 14(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 7658506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonpalpable ultrasonographically not detectable Implanon rods can be localized by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Merki-Feld GS; Brekenfeld C; Migge B; Keller PJ
    Contraception; 2001 Jun; 63(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 11672555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insertion and removal of Implanon: practical considerations.
    Mascarenhas L
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():29-34. PubMed ID: 11246605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management and localization strategies for the nonpalpable Implanon rod.
    Shulman LP; Gabriel H
    Contraception; 2006 Apr; 73(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 16531160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ovarian function during the use of a single contraceptive implant: Implanon compared with Norplant.
    Mäkäräinen L; van Beek A; Tuomivaara L; Asplund B; Coelingh Bennink H
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Apr; 69(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 9548163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
    Power J; French R; Cowan F
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; 2007(3):CD001326. PubMed ID: 17636668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of Implanon on lipid metabolism in comparison with Norplant.
    Suherman SK; Affandi B; Korver T
    Contraception; 1999 Nov; 60(5):281-7. PubMed ID: 10717780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compound versus fundamental imaging in the detection of subdermal contraceptive implants.
    Gabriel H; Shulman L; Marko J; Nikolaidis P; Chirita V
    J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Mar; 26(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 17324985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Location and removal of non-palpable Implanon implants with the aid of ultrasound guidance.
    Singh M; Mansour D; Richardson D
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2006 Jul; 32(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 16857066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Norplant removal facilitated by use of ultrasound for localization.
    Cecil H; Reed D; Holtz J
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Feb; 40(2):182-3. PubMed ID: 7852941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complex localization of single-rod contraceptive implant. Report of two clinical cases.
    Buitrón-García Figueroa RG; Rodríguez-Báez A; González-de la Cruz J; Vargas-Domínguez A; Lara-Ricalde R; Otero-Flores B
    Cir Cir; 2011; 79(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 21631980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implanon implant detection with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Westerway SC; Picker R; Christie J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Oct; 43(5):346-50. PubMed ID: 14717309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Localization of contraceptive implant capsules for removal.
    Thurmond AS; Weinstein AS; Jones MK; Jensen JT; Nichols MD
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):580-1. PubMed ID: 7972784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A randomized study comparing the efficacy and bleeding pattern of Implanon and Norplant hormonal contraceptive implant].
    Yao XY; Du MK
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jul; 38(7):419-22. PubMed ID: 12921554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Innovative technique for Norplant implants removal.
    Shihata AA; Salzetti RG; Schnepper FW; Deutsch G
    Contraception; 1995 Feb; 51(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 7750294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.
    Darney PD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. PubMed ID: 8178903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.