148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9438507)
21. Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings.
Rapp-Bernhardt U; Roehl FW; Gibbs RC; Schmidl H; Krause UW; Bernhardt TM
Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 12676965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Direct digital radiography versus storage phosphor radiography in the detection of wrist fractures.
Peer S; Neitzel U; Giacomuzzi SM; Pechlaner S; Künzel KH; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Gaber O; Jaschke W
Clin Radiol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 12014869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
Prokop M; Galanski M; Oestmann JW; von Falkenhausen U; Rosenthal H; Reimer P; Nischelsky J; Reichelt S
Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.
Geijer H; Beckman KW; Andersson T; Persliden J
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 11511892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Imaging performance with different doses in skeletal radiography: comparison of a needle-structured and a conventional storage phosphor system with a flat-panel detector.
Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Körner M
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19001150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A real-time, flat-panel, amorphous silicon, digital x-ray imager.
Antonuk LE; Yorkston J; Huang W; Siewerdsen JH; Boudry JM; el-Mohri Y; Marx MV
Radiographics; 1995 Jul; 15(4):993-1000. PubMed ID: 7569143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures in a porcine model: radiation dose requirement--digital flat-panel versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems.
Ludwig K; Schülke C; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Lenzen H; Bernhardt TM; Brinckmann P; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 12615999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature.
Völk M; Hamer OW; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):827-34. PubMed ID: 14968260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reducing the radiation dose during excretory urography: flat-panel silicon x-ray detector versus computed radiography.
Zähringer M; Hesselmann V; Schulte O; Kamm KF; Braun W; Haupt G; Krug B; Lackner K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 14500204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
Fischbach F; Ricke J; Freund T; Werk M; Spors B; Baumann C; Pech MJ; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector: reliability of digital image fusion regarding angle and distance measurements in long-leg radiography.
Hamer OW; Strotzer M; Zorger N; Paetzel C; Lerch K; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Invest Radiol; 2004 May; 39(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 15087721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Sommer A; Georgi M
Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Flat-screen detector systems in skeletal radiology].
Grampp S; Czerny C; Krestan C; Henk C; Heiner L; Imhof H
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 12764584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study.
Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Lenzen H; Röhl FW; Diederich S; Papke K; Ludwig K; Heindel W
Invest Radiol; 2004 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 14734924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
