These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

708 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9438567)

  • 1. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study.
    Nielsen LL; Hoernoe M; Wenzel A
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Sep; 6(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 9115972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of caries removal by the partial tunnel preparation method.
    Strand GV; Tveit AB
    Scand J Dent Res; 1993 Oct; 101(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 8248727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and radiographic assessment of approximal carious lesions.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1986 Feb; 44(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 3456691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
    Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficiency of three different films and radiovisiography in detecting approximal carious lesions.
    Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Topuz O
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 15709499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
    Nair MK; Nair UP
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of computer-automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Kold LM; Kold S
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Jun; 110(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 12120704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
    Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.