200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9438568)
1. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study.
Abreu M; Yi-Ching L; Abreu AL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15314000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TACT imaging of primary caries.
Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries.
Shi XQ; Han P; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 11175273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays.
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 10468469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of the number of iterative restorations on tuned aperture computed tomography for approximal caries detection.
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 11641731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
